Understanding DNS Record Types(pressable.com)
pressable.com
Understanding DNS Record Types
https://pressable.com/blog/2014/12/11/understanding-dns-record-types/
4 comments
Seems implementation specific. BIND does this you're right, but many services don't follow the rule as closely.
Actually, from RFC 1035, section 5.1:
"If an entry for an RR begins with a blank, then the RR is assumed to be owned by the last stated owner."
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt
"If an entry for an RR begins with a blank, then the RR is assumed to be owned by the last stated owner."
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt
I don't think this article is technically deep enough to be of any significant value ( at least for me ).
Not discussed at all ( and that people interested in the topic should know ) :
1. NS, SOA records
2. What exactly is TXT record.
3. What's the difference between CNAME, A Records
Later on I also checked the first article [1], which even doesn't explain what TLD is.
[1] https://pressable.com/blog/2014/12/04/dns-management-basics/
Not discussed at all ( and that people interested in the topic should know ) :
1. NS, SOA records
2. What exactly is TXT record.
3. What's the difference between CNAME, A Records
Later on I also checked the first article [1], which even doesn't explain what TLD is.
[1] https://pressable.com/blog/2014/12/04/dns-management-basics/
We'll be deep diving on specific record types and their uses next week.
A question regarding TTL. If changing the TTL value of a record will speed up (for want of a better word) when that record is available to the DNS server, why would you ever set the TTL to 3600 or more? I understand that there is some kind of caching going on but I don't actually fully understand TTL and what is ideal.
Any advice/insights/explanations appreciated!
Any advice/insights/explanations appreciated!
A lot of that has to do with costs and service levels provided by your DNS provider. There's a couple of good points at Server Fault: http://serverfault.com/questions/388289/what-are-the-benefit...
One thing I've been wondering for a while and haven't found a answer to.
Providers like Digital Ocean let you use their nameservers. Why would I do this over just using the registrars nameservers?
Providers like Digital Ocean let you use their nameservers. Why would I do this over just using the registrars nameservers?
A lot of that has to do with features and quality of the service. If you have advanced DNS needs (failover, traffic directing, etc) you may need to use a third party. If you have very basic needs sometimes the host can provide those easily for you. Additional conversation: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8605200/settings-dns-reco...
No, a blank name uses whatever name was used on the previous record. Near the top of the zone file, that name is usually the domain name because of the SOA record. But later on, it won't be.