Generative eBook Covers(nypl.org)
nypl.org
Generative eBook Covers
http://www.nypl.org/blog/2014/09/03/generative-ebook-covers
12 comments
Reclam Verlag may be the best example of beauty coming out of minimalistic, well designed book covers:
http://sprachkreis-deutsch.ch/2013/06/30/reclam-verlag-folgt...
http://www.phantasienreisen.de/2012/02/19/reclam-klassiker-i...
Book wall: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Reclam_Universalbibli...
http://sprachkreis-deutsch.ch/2013/06/30/reclam-verlag-folgt...
http://www.phantasienreisen.de/2012/02/19/reclam-klassiker-i...
Book wall: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Reclam_Universalbibli...
They replaced the old design? I liked that more. But I didn't know they had ones which are not yellow. Do you know what the different colors mean?
yellow: classic works of the German language and other languages translated into German
red: classics in their original foreign language
orange: bi-lingual books
blue: study guides
green: original historical sources with explanations
magenta: non-fiction (politics, history, society, natural sciences, art, music or religion)
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reclam
red: classics in their original foreign language
orange: bi-lingual books
blue: study guides
green: original historical sources with explanations
magenta: non-fiction (politics, history, society, natural sciences, art, music or religion)
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reclam
Yeah, interesting! It'd be cool if you had a generative book cover that was fed the author name (and maybe some other information) as a seed, where the function gives output from the same author to have the same colour, or patterns, or something, that created images similar to the gold leaf patterns. That's actually sounding quite interesting, I might have a go at it!
This is a tangent but interesting given that you cite a Franklin library book: https://twitter.com/paulg/status/498519163988496384 :
@paulg
When I got rich I let myself buy nice editions of books. But I notice the books I read are mostly cheap paperbacks.
@paulg
When I got rich I let myself buy nice editions of books. But I notice the books I read are mostly cheap paperbacks.
Both cover design and interior layout are insanely challenging. I run a small press (everybody needs a hobby: http://www.siduri.net) and the amount of time spent on covers is way out of proportion to everything else.
In an ideal world, the artist has to a) understand the book and b) create a cover that sums it up and c) produce an alternative version that isn't too heavy for the e-book.
The difference between e-book requirements and print are huge, and a few of the recent Penguin e-books I've bought all have the same cover (the Penguin logo) which looks to me like the editors just punted on the issue.
So I applaud this effort. The problem they are solving is much more difficult than it looks from the outside, and they are doing an impressive job even though the results may look less than ideal to some. Things like Project Gutenberg would be considerably enhanced if they had decent covers, and any scheme for auto-generating them that isn't positively awful [] would really help.
[] I've gotta say the first purely geometric covers in the article aren't quite my cup of tea.
In an ideal world, the artist has to a) understand the book and b) create a cover that sums it up and c) produce an alternative version that isn't too heavy for the e-book.
The difference between e-book requirements and print are huge, and a few of the recent Penguin e-books I've bought all have the same cover (the Penguin logo) which looks to me like the editors just punted on the issue.
So I applaud this effort. The problem they are solving is much more difficult than it looks from the outside, and they are doing an impressive job even though the results may look less than ideal to some. Things like Project Gutenberg would be considerably enhanced if they had decent covers, and any scheme for auto-generating them that isn't positively awful [] would really help.
[] I've gotta say the first purely geometric covers in the article aren't quite my cup of tea.
Thanks for the words of support! These are two other interesting generative cover projects: http://variable.io/generative-covers/ http://www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2008/july/faber-find...
Worth noting our effort is mostly a side project that supports the _real_ project which is the ebook reader app
Worth noting our effort is mostly a side project that supports the _real_ project which is the ebook reader app
Based on the "publicatations" on your web site, you should spend less time on covers and more on spell checking. (Sorry, I hope that's not too mean.)
I like the O´Reilly books, they just use a different animal on the cover for each book.
In my opinion, those geometric shape covers are some of the ugliest things I've ever seen.
Agreed, they remind me of 70s psychology books:
https://www.google.de/search?q=seventies+psychology&safe=off...
I hereby coin the term "depressionism" - you heard it here first, folks!
I hereby coin the term "depressionism" - you heard it here first, folks!
I think the problem is with the color relationship. The resulting shape is actually pretty cool.
Agree. Picking complementary colours 180 degrees separated in HSL space almost always creates an (IMO) clashing combination.
102 degrees would have been more sensible, while providing sufficient contrast.
Using a different, more perceptually-based colour space would be even better.
102 degrees would have been more sensible, while providing sufficient contrast.
Using a different, more perceptually-based colour space would be even better.
Fortunately the code is available for you to play with:
https://github.com/mgiraldo/tenprintcover-p5
This other project has some interesting geometric explorations:
http://variable.io/generative-covers/
https://github.com/mgiraldo/tenprintcover-p5
This other project has some interesting geometric explorations:
http://variable.io/generative-covers/
Those really abstract covers are quite Identicon-like (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identicon ).
This also reminds me of the autogenerated covers on the (ridiculously overpriced) books containing only Wikipedia articles, which were equally generic-looking but still somewhat relevant (e.g. https://images.our-assets.com/fullcover/2000x/9786131724619.... , http://www.amazon.com/Aisle-Frederic-P-Miller/dp/B009CKDZII/ )
Of course, I think the saying "Don't judge an eBook by its cover" also applies...
This also reminds me of the autogenerated covers on the (ridiculously overpriced) books containing only Wikipedia articles, which were equally generic-looking but still somewhat relevant (e.g. https://images.our-assets.com/fullcover/2000x/9786131724619.... , http://www.amazon.com/Aisle-Frederic-P-Miller/dp/B009CKDZII/ )
Of course, I think the saying "Don't judge an eBook by its cover" also applies...
As a avid reader (and collector) of old books, one thing I hate is these fake computer generated book covers.
If no cover is available, I would much prefer a simple text label.
When I do find such a book, I waste no time in stripping off the cover.
Putting a fake cover on an old book is akin to vandalism.
If no cover is available, I would much prefer a simple text label.
When I do find such a book, I waste no time in stripping off the cover.
Putting a fake cover on an old book is akin to vandalism.
If the purpose of covers is to visually differentiate among the set of books which are visible in a skeumorphic "bookshelf", could pre-computed image similarity metrics be used to maximize the difference between neighboring titles?
I specially liked the illustration ones. I wonder if perhaps some database of public art illustrations could be somehow consulted to generate covers for the books without illustrations?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/internetarchivebookimages/with...
might be a good start. These are images auto-extracted from public domain books at the Internet Archive.
might be a good start. These are images auto-extracted from public domain books at the Internet Archive.
Made me remember a series of books from '70s-'90s in Poland (about computer programming), somewhat similar in style, although I thought they were more so before googling. In case you'd be interested:
http://imgur.com/JvhuomK
http://imgur.com/Ktnec4l
http://imgur.com/JvhuomK
http://imgur.com/Ktnec4l
On first glance, those look almost like an Arabic letter. I suppose that for more abstract topics like programming, an abstract-looking cover is pretty common.
Also similar, this set of famous theoretical physics books: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-sj0HK_o3hD0/TlhDu7sl_FI/AAAAAAAAAh...
Also similar, this set of famous theoretical physics books: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-sj0HK_o3hD0/TlhDu7sl_FI/AAAAAAAAAh...
These are a great balance of similarity and differentiation.
Is there software which models the human perceptual system, e.g. algorithms that have been trained on fanous art?
Related: http://thecreatorsproject.vice.com/blog/an-intelligent-algor...
"For their research, the team chose 1,700 paintings by 66 artists, covering the 15th to the late 20th century. Using a technique that analyzes visual concepts called "classemes"—wherein objects, color shades, subjects' movement, and more are marked—the researchers created a list of 3,000 classemes for each painting, data which The Physics arXiv Blog compares to a vector. Then, they used an artificially intelligent algorithm to evaluate the vectors and look for similarities or overlapping qualities among the 1,700 paintings. ArXiv adds, "To create a ground truth against which to measure their results, they also collate expert opinions on which these artists have influenced the others."
Is there software which models the human perceptual system, e.g. algorithms that have been trained on fanous art?
Related: http://thecreatorsproject.vice.com/blog/an-intelligent-algor...
"For their research, the team chose 1,700 paintings by 66 artists, covering the 15th to the late 20th century. Using a technique that analyzes visual concepts called "classemes"—wherein objects, color shades, subjects' movement, and more are marked—the researchers created a list of 3,000 classemes for each painting, data which The Physics arXiv Blog compares to a vector. Then, they used an artificially intelligent algorithm to evaluate the vectors and look for similarities or overlapping qualities among the 1,700 paintings. ArXiv adds, "To create a ground truth against which to measure their results, they also collate expert opinions on which these artists have influenced the others."
Cool stufft, I just thinking that if you using topic modeling algorithm like LDA, then generate more informative covers :)
I wonder if it would be possible to generate a cover based on the plot?
Character name detection is pretty easy
Gender detection for the characters depends on the year of the book, but is possible with reasonable accuracy (although one would need to be careful of translations).
Key scene detection in text isn't something I know much about. I've read some research on recognising emotion in text, and it might be possible to use something like that on a rolling basis to find the most important parts of the book.
Using that information to create an illustration... would be challenging.
I can imagine algorithms to draw the character by extracting descriptions from the book. Putting them into the context described by some key scene would have a few additional problems.
Character name detection is pretty easy
Gender detection for the characters depends on the year of the book, but is possible with reasonable accuracy (although one would need to be careful of translations).
Key scene detection in text isn't something I know much about. I've read some research on recognising emotion in text, and it might be possible to use something like that on a rolling basis to find the most important parts of the book.
Using that information to create an illustration... would be challenging.
I can imagine algorithms to draw the character by extracting descriptions from the book. Putting them into the context described by some key scene would have a few additional problems.
There was a "book genome project", but recently acquired by Apple and shut down.
http://www.tapor.ca/?id=349
http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-buys-booklamp-2014-7
http://www.tapor.ca/?id=349
http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-buys-booklamp-2014-7
Is there an online demo? Would love to play with this! (And I swear it's not just because I currently have an eBook without a cover....)
For ebooks without images [10Print inspired]: https://github.com/mgiraldo/tenprintcover-p5
For ebooks with images [Gutenberg]: https://github.com/mgiraldo/tenprintcover-p5
For ebooks with images [Gutenberg]: https://github.com/mgiraldo/tenprintcover-p5
This reminds me of a Scott Adam's blog: http://www.dilbert.com/blog/entry/scotts_book_cover_design_c...
http://bibliotique.net/images/080511-aa-1.jpg
http://www.dargate.com/cat/248_auction/248_images/1722.jpg
The difference is that there is some sense of trying to make them at least a little eye pleasing. Decent fonts, some pretty gold leaf designs.
This is not good enough http://i.imgur.com/YqjnSsF.png
Some kind of more clever generative art I think is called for. It should even have some kind of sensible themeing, like all books from the same author look kind of alike or something.
http://graywolfseo.com/wp-content/uploads/library-shelf.jpg
I'm not sure I like how the examples provided here look especially, but I think the idea is a good one.