Ask HN: Comfortable, noise-canceling headphones.
6 comments
Three years ago I just went for Bose QC-15s (in-canal earbuds weren't an option for me, but might be for you, to change-up 'phones throughout the day. Most are isolating, some are noise-cancelling).
Aside from the noise-canceling, the QC-15 feature I like best after 3 years of semi-daily use is that the cable disconnects smoothly from the headset when stressed, like when you suddenly stand up while forgetting to take off the 'phones. I bought a spare cable, anticipating breakage, but I've never needed it.
These are personal, "pro-sumer" headphones, which are definitely not built to take years of daily recording studio rough-and-tumble step-on, sit-on, throw-around abuse. I've never sat on or stepped on my QC-15s, so I don't know how they'd be affected.
These headphones offer pretty good battery life (I get 40 hours, because I don't crank them loud) and soft circumaural earpads. But even with the light earpad pressure on my big head, I "run hot", so the heat and sweat build-up sometimes bothers me. This is true of all "sealing" headphones. I got some relief with my earpad covers made of stretchy t-shirt fabric. Eyeglass wearers will feel pressure on the frames; I don't know any way around it.
Sound quality is fine for me with good bass and clarity; the sound stage is so quiet it's initially a bit spooky. They're quiet enough and sensitive enough to reveal sonic source faults like my laptop's hisses and crosstalk. I don't know how durable they are against overload: I suspect fairly robust, because the speakers are driven by the 1.5V-powered internal amplifier, not the source (mixer, guitar amp, etc). But I also don't know how protected they are against input signal level over their maximum rated 9 Vrms (http://www.bose.no/NO/no/Images/owners-guide_QuietComfort_15...).
The noise canceling is excellent for my most frequent uses (office, home & planes), and very good for my second-most-frequent uses (public transit, walking). QC-15s do not block people whistling and tiny dogs yapping; I really wish Bose would allow selectable algorithms or firmware updating; I'd pay $50 for that feature.
The earpieces rotate to fold flatter in one's backpack, messenger bag or briefcase (I often roll up the cord and stow it in an earpiece compartment).
I've looked the competition to the QC-15s over the years, but I haven't been moved to switch because the features and performance keeps me satisfied. I might switch if mine broke or were stolen, and some other brand offered cable quick-disconnect and useful selectable algorithms.
The difference (with tax and/or shipping) between your target price point and $300 isn't huge.
Aside from the noise-canceling, the QC-15 feature I like best after 3 years of semi-daily use is that the cable disconnects smoothly from the headset when stressed, like when you suddenly stand up while forgetting to take off the 'phones. I bought a spare cable, anticipating breakage, but I've never needed it.
These are personal, "pro-sumer" headphones, which are definitely not built to take years of daily recording studio rough-and-tumble step-on, sit-on, throw-around abuse. I've never sat on or stepped on my QC-15s, so I don't know how they'd be affected.
These headphones offer pretty good battery life (I get 40 hours, because I don't crank them loud) and soft circumaural earpads. But even with the light earpad pressure on my big head, I "run hot", so the heat and sweat build-up sometimes bothers me. This is true of all "sealing" headphones. I got some relief with my earpad covers made of stretchy t-shirt fabric. Eyeglass wearers will feel pressure on the frames; I don't know any way around it.
Sound quality is fine for me with good bass and clarity; the sound stage is so quiet it's initially a bit spooky. They're quiet enough and sensitive enough to reveal sonic source faults like my laptop's hisses and crosstalk. I don't know how durable they are against overload: I suspect fairly robust, because the speakers are driven by the 1.5V-powered internal amplifier, not the source (mixer, guitar amp, etc). But I also don't know how protected they are against input signal level over their maximum rated 9 Vrms (http://www.bose.no/NO/no/Images/owners-guide_QuietComfort_15...).
The noise canceling is excellent for my most frequent uses (office, home & planes), and very good for my second-most-frequent uses (public transit, walking). QC-15s do not block people whistling and tiny dogs yapping; I really wish Bose would allow selectable algorithms or firmware updating; I'd pay $50 for that feature.
The earpieces rotate to fold flatter in one's backpack, messenger bag or briefcase (I often roll up the cord and stow it in an earpiece compartment).
I've looked the competition to the QC-15s over the years, but I haven't been moved to switch because the features and performance keeps me satisfied. I might switch if mine broke or were stolen, and some other brand offered cable quick-disconnect and useful selectable algorithms.
The difference (with tax and/or shipping) between your target price point and $300 isn't huge.
2 years old: http://priceonomics.com/headphones/#headphones-for-hackers
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3630011
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3630011
A lot changes in two years, but thanks. I knew I had read these before.
I am very confused after reading that post and spending some time looking at Amazon reviews.
1) Bose noise canceling headphones seem to be derided in the article as being "mass-market". Yet, they cost the highest and have the best rating on Amazon (299 when I checked).
2) Sennheiser and AKG models that were suggested by others in the reply section of this post seem to be in the $50 range and don't seem to be noise canceling headphones.
3) The ATH M50 is a few years old and still has decent reviews on Amazon.
I'm not sure about the author but I'm pretty confused about what headphones to get when coding.
1) Bose noise canceling headphones seem to be derided in the article as being "mass-market". Yet, they cost the highest and have the best rating on Amazon (299 when I checked).
2) Sennheiser and AKG models that were suggested by others in the reply section of this post seem to be in the $50 range and don't seem to be noise canceling headphones.
3) The ATH M50 is a few years old and still has decent reviews on Amazon.
I'm not sure about the author but I'm pretty confused about what headphones to get when coding.
Do you want "noise-cancelling headphones" or do you want "isolation headphones"? There is a difference. Isolation phones like the Beyer Dynamic DT770s or the Sennheiser HD380s are phenomonal sounding. They are basically studio headphones used to play tracks to the musicians while they record but they don't bleed sound out or in (so the mics don't pick up the click/backing track from the headphones and, instead, just pick up what the musician is singing/playing).
I use AKG K518. It has a fair price and a decent sound for it. It also lasts great - I used to DJ with them and I had no problems for years. The price is very good - they match it with Sennheiser HD25 in tests which you can get for the double or triple of the AKG's price.
AKG K-518 aren't noise-cancelling, just isolating, if that's enough. http://eu.akg.com/akg-product-detail-eu/k-518-dj_1.html
You should check out http://reddit.com/r/headphones and ask there for suggestions. That's a pretty good subreddit with helpful folks who seem to know their stuff
Yeah, probably a better place. I don't reddit much. In the past I would have spent hours researching what to buy, these days 15 minutes feels like I'm running out of time.
I have been using Goldring NS1000 headphones for the last 3 years and would highly recommend them.
I've been using Audio Technica ATH-M50s for several years; unfortunately they called it quits so it's time to invest in a new pair.
I'm looking for headphones that are:
Thanks!