Edward Snowden doesn’t show up once in Google’s list of top 2013 searches(washingtonpost.com)
washingtonpost.com
Edward Snowden doesn’t show up once in Google’s list of top 2013 searches
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/12/17/edward-snowden-doesnt-show-up-once-in-googles-list-of-top-2013-searches/
2 comments
Yes he is: http://i.imgur.com/ON4vZHg.jpg number #97
It's silly I can't link to an item on the zeitgeist website.
It's silly I can't link to an item on the zeitgeist website.
I was about to post this. Incredibly annoying interface if you are using a mouse. Original "proof": https://www.google.com/intl//en-US_us/zeitgeist/2013/images/...
I guess having pretty pictures to click on keeps users around longer instead of just reading a list 100 items long?
I guess having pretty pictures to click on keeps users around longer instead of just reading a list 100 items long?
What exactly is the significance of this? If it's just to report this naked fact, why bother--it's literally a few keystrokes away for most. In fact the author (Brian Fung) does have a point to make which is that while some people think Snowden is interesting, most clearly do not:
The final sentence of this Post:
"While the details of the Snowden saga may have gripped civil liberties advocates and Internet policy types — and although Snowden himself clearly thinks he's still a major subject of debate — the rest of the world seems to think otherwise."
"and although Snowden himself clearly thinks he's still a major subject of debate"? This clause links to a CNN article entitled "Snowden's open letter offers to help Brazil investigate NSA surveillance"