Antidepressants, Tap Water, and Autism(asserttrue.blogspot.com)
asserttrue.blogspot.com
Antidepressants, Tap Water, and Autism
http://asserttrue.blogspot.com/2013/02/antidepressants-tap-water-and-autism.html
7 comments
As you note the article does really a very poor job examining that connection. Interestingly, your assumption differed a bit from mine.
My assumption about that line was this: the availability of drugs for depression, and thus likely drug reps and salespeople, increased, providing greater incentives for profit through prescription, and thus increased diagnosis.
Our biases at work.
My assumption about that line was this: the availability of drugs for depression, and thus likely drug reps and salespeople, increased, providing greater incentives for profit through prescription, and thus increased diagnosis.
Our biases at work.
The same author wrote an article called "Lung Cancer and the Power of Suggestion" recently, which would suggest his hypothesis: http://asserttrue.blogspot.com/2013/02/lung-cancer-and-power...
Useful link: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=techdog (note the blog - it is the same! note the days - they are every! note the comments (when present) - they are like "this is bunk!")
I'm beginning to flag these posts.
I'm beginning to flag these posts.
I agree.
http://imgur.com/a/MQR8d
http://imgur.com/a/MQR8d
BTW, there is nothing wrong with someone submitting his own stuff.
Vote or flag submissions on their own merit, not because of the submitter.
Vote or flag submissions on their own merit, not because of the submitter.
> I'm beginning to flag these posts.
Why? Some seem to have been highly voted.
Why? Some seem to have been highly voted.
If I'm understanding the logic that this article presents... Apparently after Prozac was introduced, depression became a huge phenomenon in the US. It showed up everywhere. This is evidence to suggest that antidepressants caused depression.
Wat?
Wat?
I suspect the implication (I've heard a few notions like this) is similar to the way in which reports of alien abductions rose sharply after the Roswell UFO thingy in 1947.
Prozac was the first SSRI. It was introduced with a lot (really, even in the UK there was a lot) of hype.
It was described as "A medication to make you feel better than well. It was an outrage that this med was only available to people with a diagnosis, and we should be campaigning to change the laws about prescription meds to make it available to everyone."
(Edited to make quote clear.)
It was described as "A medication to make you feel better than well. It was an outrage that this med was only available to people with a diagnosis, and we should be campaigning to change the laws about prescription meds to make it available to everyone."
(Edited to make quote clear.)
"we should be campaigning to change the laws about prescription meds to make it available to everyone"
Did you read the article about tap water?
Did you read the article about tap water?
Yes. I'm just telling you what the attitude of some members of the public was when Prozac was introduced. (I'll edit to put it in quotes.)
Ah, gotcha. My mistake.
"This is actually some of the strongest evidence yet that psychiatric medications are connected with the sharp rise in autism that began in the 1980s."
Couldn't possibly be the huge rise in awareness of Autism in the 80's, Rainman anyone? Or the rise in parents age could it? Nah obviously pharmaceutics in the water. There are detectable levels of many things in all water including say arsenic: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/arsenic/index.c..., it's all a matter of how much, which his sources seem not to mention.
Couldn't possibly be the huge rise in awareness of Autism in the 80's, Rainman anyone? Or the rise in parents age could it? Nah obviously pharmaceutics in the water. There are detectable levels of many things in all water including say arsenic: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/arsenic/index.c..., it's all a matter of how much, which his sources seem not to mention.
From an earlier Hacker News comment
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5196734
on a submission from this blog:
> > It appears you've made some sort of resolution to publish and promote a blog entry per day in 2013. 40 entries in 41 days this year vs. 46 in all of 2012. You should reconsider - whatever your reasons were, I doubt they included a desire to develop a reputation for presenting topics that were sensationalized and thinly researched [1] produced with a pace that ensures discredited theories dont get reviewed.
[1] http://asserttrue.blogspot.com/2013/02/drug-companies-stop-h...
> Wow, nice spot and they have all been submitted to HN. I have never seen anyone's submission history be so hell bent on self promotion:
https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=techdog
The Hacker News welcome message
http://ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html
gives an overview of the community experiment here, summarizing the site guidelines.
http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
The Hacker News FAQ
http://ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html
gives some additional details about how Hacker News is administered. The welcome message distills the basic rules into a simple statement: "Essentially there are two rules here: don't post or upvote crap links, and don't be rude or dumb in comment threads."
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5196734
on a submission from this blog:
> > It appears you've made some sort of resolution to publish and promote a blog entry per day in 2013. 40 entries in 41 days this year vs. 46 in all of 2012. You should reconsider - whatever your reasons were, I doubt they included a desire to develop a reputation for presenting topics that were sensationalized and thinly researched [1] produced with a pace that ensures discredited theories dont get reviewed.
[1] http://asserttrue.blogspot.com/2013/02/drug-companies-stop-h...
> Wow, nice spot and they have all been submitted to HN. I have never seen anyone's submission history be so hell bent on self promotion:
https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=techdog
The Hacker News welcome message
http://ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html
gives an overview of the community experiment here, summarizing the site guidelines.
http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
The Hacker News FAQ
http://ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html
gives some additional details about how Hacker News is administered. The welcome message distills the basic rules into a simple statement: "Essentially there are two rules here: don't post or upvote crap links, and don't be rude or dumb in comment threads."
This seriously scares my shit out – are there any viable (domestic) water filtration systems that could reliably pull pharmaceuticals out of your drinking water?
Pur claims to remove 99% of pharmaceuticals and Brita something like 97%.
Whether autistic fish have implications for human children or not, getting unnecessarily dosed with hormones, antibiotics, and psychiatric drugs doesn't seem like a good thing.
Whether autistic fish have implications for human children or not, getting unnecessarily dosed with hormones, antibiotics, and psychiatric drugs doesn't seem like a good thing.
That may not work - organic compounds often will travel with the water vapor.
Distilling is really only for inorganic compounds. For organics you want a regular carbon filter.
Distilling is really only for inorganic compounds. For organics you want a regular carbon filter.
I'm pretty sure any ordinary carbon filter will do it.
Long Beach, Calif.: 2 (meprobamate and phenytoin). [1]
I'm drinking an anti-epileptic and an anti-anxiety. That sucks.
[1] http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-03-10-drugs-...
I'm drinking an anti-epileptic and an anti-anxiety. That sucks.
[1] http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-03-10-drugs-...
Epilepsy meds are used as mood stabilisers for people with bi-polar and sometimes for people with personality disorders.
>"Prozac was introduced in 1988, and we all know what happened then. Depression went from a relatively rare condition (affecting well under 100,000 people in the 1950s) to an epidemic disease affecting 27 million Americans. "
I'm pretty sure more than 100,000 people suffered from depression in the US in 1950. They might have just gone undiagnosed and self-medicated with alcohol rather than (non-existent) pharmaceuticals. Given that the mental health state of the art in 1950 was an icepick to the frontal lobe, I can hardly blame them for not seeking treatment.
I would imagine that the increase in _diagnosed_ depressed patients occurred because of an increase in both awareness and viable treatment options.