Facebook rumored to buy startup Face.com for up to $100 million(thenextweb.com)
thenextweb.com
Facebook rumored to buy startup Face.com for up to $100 million
http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2012/05/28/facebook-rumored-to-buy-facial-recognition-tech-startup-face-com-for-up-to-100-million/
7 comments
If Facebook starts spending their $16bn of cash in companies with "rich" valuations which provide equal or lower implied FB growth rates (market valuation wise), FB's stock is going to plummet. Having a pile of cash can be a problem.
Any country with CCTV or public surveillance (perhaps satellite?) could use FB's pics and Face together to track who's where and when. It'd be a synergy for surveillance, I just wonder who's got the best technology to do it.
That's not how the Face API works. An app needs the user to be logged into FB, and then the app can attempt face recognition for that user and their direct FB friends only. For a government to do this it would need collusion with Facebook; with or without the Face API.
As for satellite surveillance - even if modern military satellite imagery had that kind of resolution (it doesn't), and ignoring atmospheric conditions (a bit hard to do for the UK), it's hard to imagine how they would do face recognition from the tops of peoples heads.
With all due respect, your paranoia is misplaced.
As for satellite surveillance - even if modern military satellite imagery had that kind of resolution (it doesn't), and ignoring atmospheric conditions (a bit hard to do for the UK), it's hard to imagine how they would do face recognition from the tops of peoples heads.
With all due respect, your paranoia is misplaced.
Hey, who you calling paranoid? Whatever you say big brother.
The UK is supposed to have the most CCTV coverage in the world. According to this article[1] there is one camera for every 34 people in the UK.
[1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/mar/02/cctv-cameras-watchi...
[1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/mar/02/cctv-cameras-watchi...
US on the way it seems. http://www.infowars.com/talking-surveillance-cameras-coming-...
Interesting comment on the article:
Makes more sense for Google to buy them. They could do two things with them:
1: build the technology into their Google Glasses so peoples names pop up as they come into view 2: redirect face.com to Google.com.
That second option would be well worth the 100 million too. Consider this: after you visited face.com once every next time you want to go to facebook.com and type in 'face' your browser will auto-complete to face.com
1 and 2 are both interesting scenarios.
Makes more sense for Google to buy them. They could do two things with them:
1: build the technology into their Google Glasses so peoples names pop up as they come into view 2: redirect face.com to Google.com.
That second option would be well worth the 100 million too. Consider this: after you visited face.com once every next time you want to go to facebook.com and type in 'face' your browser will auto-complete to face.com
1 and 2 are both interesting scenarios.
Doesn't Face.com have an API? I think the active users of that would be upset if all the documentation/etc. for it just disappeared and started redirecting to Google.
More to the point, a free API. I can't see Facebook or Google keeping the API around if they acquired Face.com, which would be very sad. Of course, it would be a technology rather than a user acquisition, so I don't suppose whoever was buying would care that much.
[deleted]
Huh. I thought Instagram had pretty much set a lower bar on the price of a startup with no revenue. Guess I was wrong.
[deleted](1)
Suppose I own 5% of Facebook.
Does that mean I get 5 votes out of 100 whether to reject this acquisition? No.
Does that mean I get 5% of the annual revenue for Facebook? No.
Does that mean I can hire my friends to work for Facebook? No.
But But.. I OWN 5% of Facebook! What the hell?
Nope, you own 5% of Facebook shares that are worth as much as what someone else is going to pay for it.
Hence Stock market = elaborate pyramid scheme
But a necessary one to support pension funds, 401Ks, retirement, etc. I mean HOW else is 1 dollar turn to 10 dollars after 40 years?!
Plus, it leads to jobs - illusionary, fake ones, but jobs nonetheless.
Younger generation paying for older - makes sense.. it'll fall apart whenever human race dies off.
Does that mean I get 5 votes out of 100 whether to reject this acquisition? No.
Does that mean I get 5% of the annual revenue for Facebook? No.
Does that mean I can hire my friends to work for Facebook? No.
But But.. I OWN 5% of Facebook! What the hell?
Nope, you own 5% of Facebook shares that are worth as much as what someone else is going to pay for it.
Hence Stock market = elaborate pyramid scheme
But a necessary one to support pension funds, 401Ks, retirement, etc. I mean HOW else is 1 dollar turn to 10 dollars after 40 years?!
Plus, it leads to jobs - illusionary, fake ones, but jobs nonetheless.
Younger generation paying for older - makes sense.. it'll fall apart whenever human race dies off.