A Macbookpro alternative with similar build quality
Hi,
I need to get a new laptop and I wont like to get a new laptop with a build quality thats very similar to a macbookpro. Any suggestions?
9 comments
Thinkpad.
Don't bother listening to some other people recommending a MacBook of some variety if you really want to run Linux on it. As someone else mentioned, I've never gotten Linux working on it and not have it heat up to crazy levels with the fans running constantly. The multitouch features of the trackpad don't work and so on.
Your best nearest bet is a Thinkpad. Be sure to DDG (DuckDuckGo) the particular model you're looking at to get a jist of other people's experiences running Linux on it.
An old X200 here and Ubuntu runs great.
Don't bother listening to some other people recommending a MacBook of some variety if you really want to run Linux on it. As someone else mentioned, I've never gotten Linux working on it and not have it heat up to crazy levels with the fans running constantly. The multitouch features of the trackpad don't work and so on.
Your best nearest bet is a Thinkpad. Be sure to DDG (DuckDuckGo) the particular model you're looking at to get a jist of other people's experiences running Linux on it.
An old X200 here and Ubuntu runs great.
Agreed that the model as well as features present are the important issue. Most thinkpads have either perfect or near perfect linux support, so the main question is which feature set and known design defects the OP will want to live with. For example, some keyboards or screens are better than others, some batteries last longer than others (x220!), and so forth.
The price on Apple hardware isn't a premium. It's that price b/c it's top shelf quality. Even the displays on the Dell Precision laptops don't capare to those any anything Apple makes.
+1 for the user who suggested a used Mac. I've recommended them that option to a few friends, no one has ever regretted it.
As far as quality goes, I'm still using a 4 year old Macbook (not even a pro) on a daily basis. Still very relevant with a 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo and 4 GB ram.
+1 for the user who suggested a used Mac. I've recommended them that option to a few friends, no one has ever regretted it.
As far as quality goes, I'm still using a 4 year old Macbook (not even a pro) on a daily basis. Still very relevant with a 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo and 4 GB ram.
Quality isn't just a single thing. If Thunderbolt for instance adds $50 to the price, and I don't plan to use Thunderbolt, that $50 is a fair premium but not something I wish to pay for.
Thinkpads. They might not look as nice, but they are very robust.
I have already dropped mine from the table and flooded the keyboard with an entire glass of diet soda.
If I am out working with other people I always smile when people start putting their macbooks into special protective sleeves and what not. I just take mine and throw it into my bag.
I have already dropped mine from the table and flooded the keyboard with an entire glass of diet soda.
If I am out working with other people I always smile when people start putting their macbooks into special protective sleeves and what not. I just take mine and throw it into my bag.
You're probably looking for this: http://www.razerzone.com/blade
Perhaps I can narrow down exactly what you're looking for. What are you looking for in terms of:
-screen size (any preference toward matte or glossy?)
-weight
-CPU and video card
-battery life
-cost
-screen size (any preference toward matte or glossy?)
-weight
-CPU and video card
-battery life
-cost
I am looking at
1. overall build quality i.e. something macbookish
2. battery like 6+ hours would be sweet
3. cost under $1000
4. screen size - 15" matte (I hate glossy, print magnets)
Thanks
Given another reply that you posted, I'm not sure 6+ hours would be reasonable using Ubuntu without a massive battery slab. Even with a bunch of tweaking, battery life tends to be lower than what one would get with Windows.
I would suggest you look at HP EliteBooks and Lenovo ThinkPads. For instance, a ThinkPad W510 or EliteBook 8540w.
I personally own an HP EliteBook 8540p.
-2.53 gHz i5 CPU
-NVIDIA NVS 5100m (equivalent to the GeForce 330m)
-15" matte 1600x900 resolution (quality comparable MacBook: http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5881&p=...)
-4-5 hour battery life, although I'm still using the original battery
-built like an absolute tank
I got it off of eBay for $600 last summer. The models I mentioned above can have 1080p configurations, and I know for a fact that the 8540w has the DreamColor configuration, which is about the best display you can have in a laptop; they're quite rare, however.
You'd probably have trouble picking up brand-new, refreshed models for under $1000, but that would be the same case for a MacBook.
I would suggest you look at HP EliteBooks and Lenovo ThinkPads. For instance, a ThinkPad W510 or EliteBook 8540w.
I personally own an HP EliteBook 8540p.
-2.53 gHz i5 CPU
-NVIDIA NVS 5100m (equivalent to the GeForce 330m)
-15" matte 1600x900 resolution (quality comparable MacBook: http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5881&p=...)
-4-5 hour battery life, although I'm still using the original battery
-built like an absolute tank
I got it off of eBay for $600 last summer. The models I mentioned above can have 1080p configurations, and I know for a fact that the 8540w has the DreamColor configuration, which is about the best display you can have in a laptop; they're quite rare, however.
You'd probably have trouble picking up brand-new, refreshed models for under $1000, but that would be the same case for a MacBook.
Thinkpads have good quality, and may come in cheaper than a Macbook.
They're definitely 30-50% cheaper, but it shows. The ThinkLight instead of backlit keyboard, smaller single-touch trackpad, heavy 9-cell battery that quickly loses its capacity, mediocre screen, heavier weight.. but it still holds its own compared to other laptops in the same price range.
This is a difficult comment to respond to, because it is not clear whether you are trying to describe a specific ThinkPad model, or trying to justify the fact that some Apple laptops cost more.
For example, I am writing this on a T500, which does have a single-touch trackpad, but it is also 4 years old. Its successor (the T510), as well as the present model (the T520) both have multi-touch touchpads. If you have experience with an older model of ThinkPad and are trying to compare it to the current generation of Apple laptops, I would argue that you do not have enough data to make a comparison.
For example, I am writing this on a T500, which does have a single-touch trackpad, but it is also 4 years old. Its successor (the T510), as well as the present model (the T520) both have multi-touch touchpads. If you have experience with an older model of ThinkPad and are trying to compare it to the current generation of Apple laptops, I would argue that you do not have enough data to make a comparison.
The last one I used was a T400; I should have mentioned that. I wasn't aware that the newer models have multitouch trackpads - are they nice?
I'm fairly certain any Thinkpad made in the last two or three years has a multi-touch trackpad AND a trackpoint.
The HP Envy has similar design to the Mac Books
Take a look at Dell XPS 15Z
Get a macbook pro! (sorry, couldn't resist)
dude,
I am considering cost and also the fact that I am more of a Ubuntu user.
If cost is a restricting factor you should check out the refurbished section on the Apple store. I never buy new Apple products, the refurbs are just as good and the savings can be considerable. I've purchased 2 refurb Macbook Pros and 3 iMacs. Never once had a problem.
Unless you buy a Macbook that a year or two old, the best you can do is 10-15% which is pretty underwhelming in my opinion.
If you do buy one that is over a year old, the discount can go up to 25%, which is a horrible deal for a computer that was released 1-2 years ago.
Personally, if I were going to buy a used model, I'd check out what's available locally on craigslist.
If you do buy one that is over a year old, the discount can go up to 25%, which is a horrible deal for a computer that was released 1-2 years ago.
Personally, if I were going to buy a used model, I'd check out what's available locally on craigslist.
Similar build quality is going to demand a similar price. Apple memory upgrades are about the only thing remaining that really is overpriced, but their base hardware is pretty reasonable. And you can definitely dual boot it or just wipe the OS and reinstall :)
Also, if you're not dead-set on having a brand new machine, you could get a used one on craigslist and save a couple of hundred.
Other than that, the only laptops that I've seen come close have been Sony's, and they tend to be even more expensive.
Also, if you're not dead-set on having a brand new machine, you could get a used one on craigslist and save a couple of hundred.
Other than that, the only laptops that I've seen come close have been Sony's, and they tend to be even more expensive.
If we are talking about the Macbook Air, Apple's build quality can't be beat at that pricepoint. If we are talking about full sized laptops, a Macbook is almost absurdly expensive for what it offers.
I've had Asus, Samsung, and Alienware laptops that were built just as well as a Macbook, yet cost a fraction of the price. In addition, the specs exceeded a top of the line Macbook Pro by a longshot. The Asus and the Alienware were really ugly, but the build quality was exceptional.
If I were in the market for an ultrabook, I'd easily pick the Macbook Air. If I wanted a well built desktop replacment, I'd consider the Macbook Pro, but I would also take a look at Asus, Samsung, Lenovo, and even Alienware* before I make my final decision.
On a final note, the specific model if far more important than the brand. Every PC manufacturer has good models and bad models. If you find a specific computer that you like, you should check out as many reviews as you can find on the internet before you buy it.
*I'd stay away from Alienware if you can't handle the hideous design.
I've had Asus, Samsung, and Alienware laptops that were built just as well as a Macbook, yet cost a fraction of the price. In addition, the specs exceeded a top of the line Macbook Pro by a longshot. The Asus and the Alienware were really ugly, but the build quality was exceptional.
If I were in the market for an ultrabook, I'd easily pick the Macbook Air. If I wanted a well built desktop replacment, I'd consider the Macbook Pro, but I would also take a look at Asus, Samsung, Lenovo, and even Alienware* before I make my final decision.
On a final note, the specific model if far more important than the brand. Every PC manufacturer has good models and bad models. If you find a specific computer that you like, you should check out as many reviews as you can find on the internet before you buy it.
*I'd stay away from Alienware if you can't handle the hideous design.
How many people here have installed any linux distro on a macbook pro after wiping OSX? how was the experience like? I would really like to know. And how much does the OS cost contribute to the overall price of a macbook pro? would buying one and wiping it clean make economic sense?
As far as I know, the multitouch trackpad doesn't have fully-functioning drivers for Windows/Linux. On a 2011 15", I can run Ubuntu fullscreen seamlessly (literally swipe left and right between Mac and Ubuntu, with no cursor capturing or anything). I think it's the best way to get full usage out of your Mac while still using Linux - and you can setup shared folders between Mac and your VM, or SSH from one to the other.
I don't see OSX as being an additional cost like Windows - all Macs come with OSX, and it doesn't have to license it from a separate company, like the Dell and Microsoft relationship. The only cost would be $30 every other year for upgrades, but even those are optional.
A refurb definitely wouldn't be a bad option, I have a refurbed iMac and if it didn't come in a brown box saying "Refurbished" I'd have never known. The only thing I will say is that adding a few hundred bucks to your budget for the 3 year warranty is 100% worth it - something breaks, you just schedule an appointment at the Apple store, and they'll take care of it.
I don't see OSX as being an additional cost like Windows - all Macs come with OSX, and it doesn't have to license it from a separate company, like the Dell and Microsoft relationship. The only cost would be $30 every other year for upgrades, but even those are optional.
A refurb definitely wouldn't be a bad option, I have a refurbed iMac and if it didn't come in a brown box saying "Refurbished" I'd have never known. The only thing I will say is that adding a few hundred bucks to your budget for the 3 year warranty is 100% worth it - something breaks, you just schedule an appointment at the Apple store, and they'll take care of it.
The X86 ones aren't bad. You may want to use something like reEFIt or the like as a bootloader (Mac's don't use BIOS).
The only gotcha is that many of the nice "boot to other OS" features
Use this page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MactelSupportTeam/CommunityHelpPages
I decided after awhile, I liked the linux install in a VM instead of a dual boot (Mac OS X is a unix, and the VM on a SSD didn't hurt at all) and wiped it back out.
Historically, Apple charges about 30-70 USD for the OS, so less than the windows OEM license you are paying for on non-Apple hardware
I have no idea if Linux distros work with a completely blank drive, have only dual booted.
The only gotcha is that many of the nice "boot to other OS" features
Use this page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MactelSupportTeam/CommunityHelpPages
I decided after awhile, I liked the linux install in a VM instead of a dual boot (Mac OS X is a unix, and the VM on a SSD didn't hurt at all) and wiped it back out.
Historically, Apple charges about 30-70 USD for the OS, so less than the windows OEM license you are paying for on non-Apple hardware
I have no idea if Linux distros work with a completely blank drive, have only dual booted.
I tried installing Ubuntu on a MBP my office bought for me. It was a while ago, but the killer for me was that the fans didn't work properly. It would overheat within 5 minutes of use.
I highly recommend a Strata from ZaReason (zareason.com). Unless you're going to be doing a lot of graphics-intensive stuff, definitely go for one with an Intel graphics card, b/c nvidia is a pain on Linux.
I highly recommend a Strata from ZaReason (zareason.com). Unless you're going to be doing a lot of graphics-intensive stuff, definitely go for one with an Intel graphics card, b/c nvidia is a pain on Linux.
> I highly recommend a Strata from ZaReason (zareason.com). Unless you're going to be doing a lot of graphics-intensive stuff, definitely go for one with an Intel graphics card, b/c nvidia is a pain on Linux.
I'm assuming you meant to qualify that as NVIDIA's mobile chipsets. Though, I can't say I've had much trouble with them. I've certainly never had much trouble with their desktop products under Linux--I currently dual boot my home desktop between Linux and Windows with an NVIDIA card, and it runs just as well under either (ironically, Minecraft plays more smoothly under Linux...).
Certainly there are some general complaints related to NVIDIA's Linux drivers, but to be completely honest, I've run many NVIDIA cards--including mobile--under a variety of Linux flavors over the years and had few troubles. I even tried installing Arch on an ancient Dell laptop of mine for fun which is equipped with one of the early GeForce Go chipsets, and it still works quite well (KDE4 not so much, but LXDE is perfect); however, it requires installing an older driver.
I'd like to know where you got your information from, because I've run Ubuntu, Gentoo, and Arch all on top of fairly recent NVIDIA hardware. The only relatively minor difficulties I've had have all involved minor tweaks to xorg.conf but even those have greatly diminished in necessity.
I'm assuming you meant to qualify that as NVIDIA's mobile chipsets. Though, I can't say I've had much trouble with them. I've certainly never had much trouble with their desktop products under Linux--I currently dual boot my home desktop between Linux and Windows with an NVIDIA card, and it runs just as well under either (ironically, Minecraft plays more smoothly under Linux...).
Certainly there are some general complaints related to NVIDIA's Linux drivers, but to be completely honest, I've run many NVIDIA cards--including mobile--under a variety of Linux flavors over the years and had few troubles. I even tried installing Arch on an ancient Dell laptop of mine for fun which is equipped with one of the early GeForce Go chipsets, and it still works quite well (KDE4 not so much, but LXDE is perfect); however, it requires installing an older driver.
I'd like to know where you got your information from, because I've run Ubuntu, Gentoo, and Arch all on top of fairly recent NVIDIA hardware. The only relatively minor difficulties I've had have all involved minor tweaks to xorg.conf but even those have greatly diminished in necessity.
Good points all. I can only speak from personal experience. With my laptop, I'm usually plugging in to various monitors of different sizes and in different positions. In order to configure the monitors, you have to use NVIDIA's proprietary configuration tool, which "works", but fails consistently in weird patterns. For instance, when I first try to configure a new monitor, it consistently freezes up for about 30 seconds, reverts to the old display, and then magically works when I try it again. And heaven forbid I want to align my monitors along the bottom edge (or "absolutely positioned"). There's a bug somewhere between the card, the configuration software, X, and Gnome that leaves half of one of my monitors black and inaccessible.
As long as I leave my monitor setup as is and don't stir up too much dust, though, it works great.
As long as I leave my monitor setup as is and don't stir up too much dust, though, it works great.