Analyzing the Top 10,000 Websites' HTTP Headers(shodanhq.com)
shodanhq.com
Analyzing the Top 10,000 Websites' HTTP Headers
http://www.shodanhq.com/research/infodisc/report
5 comments
It's down for me.
Cached version: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:BVs3oHY...
What does "grabbing the banners of those websites" mean?
What would I type into wget or curl to download the "banner" of a site?
What would I type into wget or curl to download the "banner" of a site?
Correct me if I am wrong but any of those extra headers except "Strict-Transport-Security" actually REDUCE security.
By default the browser will be in it's more secure state and those headers actually drop the security to allow cross communication with (specific) other websites.
By default the browser will be in it's more secure state and those headers actually drop the security to allow cross communication with (specific) other websites.
You may be right about X-XSS-Protection (with the IE8 bug) and Access-Control-Allow-Origin (when set to "*"), but I wouldn't say that X-Frame-Options reduces security. It has two possible values, SAMEORIGIN and DENY, both of which help prevent clickjacking attacks without allowing any additional cross-communication.
Page is down...
I'm worried to think how site operators will adopt CSP (Content Security Policy) once it starts to gain traction.