[untitled]
6 comments
I'm not really suggesting censorship. W3Schools is pretty well known for often having just plain wrong information.
I'm simply concerned by the fact that they consistently rank highly on Google, which leads to the spread of incorrect information.
I'm simply concerned by the fact that they consistently rank highly on Google, which leads to the spread of incorrect information.
I don't get the hate. I like W3schools it is a great source to lookup something I forgot.
W3schools is known for giving wrong, horribly out-of-date, and Internet Explorer-specific advice. (It has no connection with the W3C.)
It is one of the more complete reference websites, but anything you learn there should be checked elsewhere.
It is one of the more complete reference websites, but anything you learn there should be checked elsewhere.
Check out w3fools.com for a list of reasons why it's not a good resource.
I think w3schools bashing is unjustified. It's good enough for most things. I use it all the time for a quick reference. I've never found anything there blatantly wrong or misleading besides the domain name.
Looking at the list on w3fools, it seems a little pedantic (aka nitpicky).
Looking at the list on w3fools, it seems a little pedantic (aka nitpicky).
w3schools? thats where i learned. hmm
Some other suggestions:
- efreedom.com
- experts-exchange.com
- efreedom.com
- experts-exchange.com
It's for content farms only. Not unpopular sites, religions, etc. You think Google is going to remove whitehouse.gov from all results if enough of the world votes to block it?
I'd say it's for blocking things that are objectively farmed or splogs, not sites with correct information that happens to be subjectively poor quality or out of date. It's for improving the index, not cleansing the internet.