Mahalo.com screws all their writers(searchengineoptimisation.org)
searchengineoptimisation.org
Mahalo.com screws all their writers
http://www.searchengineoptimisation.org/mahalo-com-screw-all-their-writers/
9 comments
After a particularly frustrating day I reminded myself that at least I don't work at Mahalo.
I'll pretend to be surprised here. GASP
I think the fairest solution and surprisingly the one not used here would be to "Grandfather" the revenue sharing pages in ~ but not allow any more pages to be built on that model.
I am sure that it was thought of and discussed internally and then they went with the "I bet we can take it a little farther and never pay recurring feeds again.." which will save the company a lot of money per month..
I am sure that it was thought of and discussed internally and then they went with the "I bet we can take it a little farther and never pay recurring feeds again.." which will save the company a lot of money per month..
meanwhile, on twitter...
"@Skitzzo here is the truth... http://jc.is/cyTdfu
jason links back to his announcement on mahalo of the new system that now has 50+ comments. the truth is certainly in there.
"The terms of service of Mahalo always had people wondering if something like this could happen. I actually encouraged other people to join Mahalo and defended Mahalo on other writing sites like Absolute Write. I just hope those people will forgive me."
"The entire guide system is based on the premise of writers being so desperate that they'd be willing to sell their time for a few dollars an hour with no rev share to provide long-term quasi-passive income."
"@Skitzzo here is the truth... http://jc.is/cyTdfu
jason links back to his announcement on mahalo of the new system that now has 50+ comments. the truth is certainly in there.
"The terms of service of Mahalo always had people wondering if something like this could happen. I actually encouraged other people to join Mahalo and defended Mahalo on other writing sites like Absolute Write. I just hope those people will forgive me."
"The entire guide system is based on the premise of writers being so desperate that they'd be willing to sell their time for a few dollars an hour with no rev share to provide long-term quasi-passive income."
This is all 100% false.
We did change our model from revenue sharing to paying writers, but we did not steal any money or not pay anyone. Also, we publish under Creative Commons, so folks are welcome to do whatever they like with the content provide they shoot us a link back.
This is just false, and in fact probably libelous, stuff.
We did change our model from revenue sharing to paying writers, but we did not steal any money or not pay anyone. Also, we publish under Creative Commons, so folks are welcome to do whatever they like with the content provide they shoot us a link back.
This is just false, and in fact probably libelous, stuff.
There is no reason to down vote this comment. I know the HN collective dislikes Jason, but there is nothing wrong with it.
a word..
HuffingtonPost TechCrunch Gawker Mahalo
what do these have in common?
They all change writers contracts whenever the business favor winds blow in a different direction..ie whether we like it or not Jason is using a standard industry practice.
HuffingtonPost TechCrunch Gawker Mahalo
what do these have in common?
They all change writers contracts whenever the business favor winds blow in a different direction..ie whether we like it or not Jason is using a standard industry practice.
From what I understand, the difference is that JC specifically promised revenue sharing.
We did not promise revenue sharing forever. We said we were going to try revenue sharing and we, of course, reserve the right to change our model.
We tried hard to make revenue sharing work, and it only worked for 5% of the audience. So, instead of pretending that freelance writers wanted something they told us they didn't, we pivoted and we're moving to a more About.com-like flatrate with a bonus system.
Now we have a line of folks out the door who want to work for us.
We tried hard to make revenue sharing work, and it only worked for 5% of the audience. So, instead of pretending that freelance writers wanted something they told us they didn't, we pivoted and we're moving to a more About.com-like flatrate with a bonus system.
Now we have a line of folks out the door who want to work for us.
Why do we get articles about how much Mahalo.com sucks every day here at Hacker News? Why don't we just ignore them? I'm serious, I don't care about Mahalo, I barely even know what it is. Why do people keep posting stories about it? Is it just some weird kind of reverse-psychology marketing or something?
I think for the most part Mahalo represents the growing problem with Google and aggravating anyone doing SEO work.
To many searches on Google turn up a first page full of optimized pages focusing on advertising rather than the content. Sites like Mahalo make it very difficult for the little guy to optimize and get value from Google. Kinda like trying to get anything on the Digg home page.
To many searches on Google turn up a first page full of optimized pages focusing on advertising rather than the content. Sites like Mahalo make it very difficult for the little guy to optimize and get value from Google. Kinda like trying to get anything on the Digg home page.
I think there's a lot of schadenfreude when it comes to Calacanis' more recent tribulations (starting with his Digg clone on Netscape).
This is especially true in New York where he's known as a grade-A douche bag (even by New York standards -- and that's saying something).
This is especially true in New York where he's known as a grade-A douche bag (even by New York standards -- and that's saying something).