Oliver Sacks has died(nytimes.com)
nytimes.com
Oliver Sacks has died
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/31/science/oliver-sacks-dies-at-82-neurologist-and-author-explored-the-brains-quirks.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0
14 comments
> my once-firm muscles melted away by cancer
A less-known side of Sacks: he held the California state record for a 600 lb squat in his younger years.
A less-known side of Sacks: he held the California state record for a 600 lb squat in his younger years.
A number of photos are floating around Reddit:
600# squat, while interning in San Francisco: http://i.imgur.com/BhetDWl.jpg
On the beach: http://i.imgur.com/RSjcMzm.jpg
In Greenwich Village, 1961: https://i.imgur.com/6VIaPX1.jpg
More recently, swimming: https://jennifernew.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/imgres.jpg
600# squat, while interning in San Francisco: http://i.imgur.com/BhetDWl.jpg
On the beach: http://i.imgur.com/RSjcMzm.jpg
In Greenwich Village, 1961: https://i.imgur.com/6VIaPX1.jpg
More recently, swimming: https://jennifernew.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/imgres.jpg
He also had a collection of every atomic element. That's no small accomplishment.
Oh wow, that's genuinely impressive. I'm guessing it wouldn't have the synthetic elements, but still -- amazing.
[deleted]
[deleted]
Wow, I had no idea. That's truly impressive, especially for the time.
And interesting HN thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10065710
And today is Sunday.
The Jewish Sabbath is Friday sundown (three stars visible) to Saturday sundown.
Edit: see mark212's clarification below. I've confused the start and end.
Edit: see mark212's clarification below. I've confused the start and end.
Actually, the Sabbath is from Friday Night to Saturday night. The Christians have perverted this.
Isn't that what I wrote?
Not to be overly picky, but the three stars visible thing is when Shabbat ends on Saturday night, not when it begins.
The start of Shabbat strictly speaking is when the sun dips below the horizon and is commemorated by the lighting of two shabbat candles.
The last time for lighting those candles is 18 minutes prior to the astronomical event of sun-below-horizon, which under rabbinical interpretation is the true beginning of shabbat (that is, the last minute during which "work" -- in the technical, term of art sense -- may be performed without sanction).
It's a key event in Jewish ritual and not surprisingly there's a ton of commentary and meaning-making that has attached to how, when, where, and why Shabbat observance is undertaken. It is said that "More than the Jews have kept Shabbat, Shabbat has kept the Jews."
The start of Shabbat strictly speaking is when the sun dips below the horizon and is commemorated by the lighting of two shabbat candles.
The last time for lighting those candles is 18 minutes prior to the astronomical event of sun-below-horizon, which under rabbinical interpretation is the true beginning of shabbat (that is, the last minute during which "work" -- in the technical, term of art sense -- may be performed without sanction).
It's a key event in Jewish ritual and not surprisingly there's a ton of commentary and meaning-making that has attached to how, when, where, and why Shabbat observance is undertaken. It is said that "More than the Jews have kept Shabbat, Shabbat has kept the Jews."
Thank you for the clarification.
Thank you, Mark for defending me. Nothing bothers me more than when Silicon Valley geeks try to take Jewish law and twist it to fit their new-age mumbo jumbo.
This is why I love the javascript that allows me to collapse threads.
> not on the supernatural or spiritual
> what is meant by living a good and worthwhile life — achieving a sense of peace within oneself
I would say this is pretty much definition of “spiritual”…
> what is meant by living a good and worthwhile life — achieving a sense of peace within oneself
I would say this is pretty much definition of “spiritual”…
How? I was under the impression that spirit means the idea of a noncorporial essence that survives the body. I wonder what leap you're making to get there from here.
If anything I think his books are his distributed essence, worming their way into the collective unconscious, and collective conscious.
If anything I think his books are his distributed essence, worming their way into the collective unconscious, and collective conscious.
Sacks was clearly a great doctor in many ways. But he'll probably be better known, and remembered, for popularizing science and medicine in a way that we rarely see: He describes people's symptoms carefully, but also sympathetically. He treats patients using science, which is supposed to be dispassionate, but does so with what's obviously a great deal of care. And he reveals science to us, not as a cold set of rules that govern the world, but as something that provides us with an infinitely large number of wondrous, almost miraculous, combinations of events.
Sacks articulated -- perhaps not explicitly -- that science isn't merely reductionist, cold, logical, and unemotional. He loved learning new things, and was clearly overjoyed to learn, understand, and appreciate the amazing universe in which we live.
It has been many years since I read, "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat," but I remember loving every page. His later books aren't as famous, but his writing continued to be enchanting and inviting, even when the subjects weren't necessarily my cup of tea.
We in Western societies tend to shut down discussions of death, and what it means. The writing that Sacks produced over the last year have been some of the most poignant, chilling, and inspiring essays that he produced. It's sad that he's gone, but I'm grateful that he shared so much of his work, and his life (and ultimately death) with all of us.
Sacks articulated -- perhaps not explicitly -- that science isn't merely reductionist, cold, logical, and unemotional. He loved learning new things, and was clearly overjoyed to learn, understand, and appreciate the amazing universe in which we live.
It has been many years since I read, "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat," but I remember loving every page. His later books aren't as famous, but his writing continued to be enchanting and inviting, even when the subjects weren't necessarily my cup of tea.
We in Western societies tend to shut down discussions of death, and what it means. The writing that Sacks produced over the last year have been some of the most poignant, chilling, and inspiring essays that he produced. It's sad that he's gone, but I'm grateful that he shared so much of his work, and his life (and ultimately death) with all of us.
> The writing that Sacks produced over the last year have been some of the most poignant, chilling, and inspiring essays that he produced. It's sad that he's gone, but I'm grateful that he shared so much of his work, and his life (and ultimately death) with all of us.
I'd like to read it. Which pieces are you referring to (besides the Sabbath piece, which I've read)?
I'd like to read it. Which pieces are you referring to (besides the Sabbath piece, which I've read)?
You can find links to all of them within the NYT obituary (which is the originally linked article for this thread).
“My religion is nature. That’s what arouses those feelings of wonder and mysticism and gratitude in me.” -- Oliver Sacks
Oliver now gets to take all the elements he borrowed, and that he loved so dearly, and return them back to the stars from which they came. His spirit has dissolved now into it's new form as a complex abstract of memories, ideas, and collective appreciation, where it will now live alongside nature; it's original muse and creator.
Oliver now gets to take all the elements he borrowed, and that he loved so dearly, and return them back to the stars from which they came. His spirit has dissolved now into it's new form as a complex abstract of memories, ideas, and collective appreciation, where it will now live alongside nature; it's original muse and creator.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/07/26/opinion/my-periodic-tab... "Times of stress throughout my life have led me to turn, or return, to the physical sciences, a world where there is no life, but also no death."
It's sad to hear that he died. I just started reading his book, "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat". It's an extremely interesting book about the case stories of some of his most interesting patients. The book gives a lot of insight into the lives of patients with the strangest brain dysfunctions, and puts into perspective many of the things we take for granted, such as how we recognize facial expressions, our own body and more. I'd definitely recommend it to anyone who's interested in neuroscience or even artificial intelligence.
recent radiolab episode http://www.radiolab.org/story/archives-oliver-sacks-table-el...
I recommend [1] as well where radiolab basically says goodbye to him and he tells his life story. That one hit me so hard because he obviously went out with his full mental capacity, leaving an even bigger gap.
[1] http://www.radiolab.org/story/radiolab-live-telltale-hearts-...
[1] http://www.radiolab.org/story/radiolab-live-telltale-hearts-...
A great loss, made no less shocking for all its foreshadowing due to his illness. The knowledge he shared through his work and his books have had a lasting impact on my life and the lives of others. Would that we all leave such a legacy.
It is always sad when a person curious about the world dies. He provided me with many stimulating hours of reading and for that I will miss him.
And he could squat 600 lbs, when he was younger of course.
https://media2.wnyc.org/i/620/599/l/80/1/Sacks_Lifting_dr_sq...
That's not a trivial weight.
https://media2.wnyc.org/i/620/599/l/80/1/Sacks_Lifting_dr_sq...
That's not a trivial weight.
I am sad he died but I am so glad he'd lived.
His autobiography, which he read on BBC Radio Four, was fascinating. Especially hos description of his addiction to drugs and his recovery.
[1] sadly not still available. It's proba ly around from other sources. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b062jsmz
[1] sadly not still available. It's proba ly around from other sources. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b062jsmz
I liked this little personal piece about his desk/apartment http://sciencefriday.com/video/11/09/2012/desktop-diaries-ol...
[deleted]
He contibuted more to literature, if it can be called that, than to neurology. His writings were akin to the breathless articles in Wired on the "AMAZING DIGITAL FUTURE".
If you want to read real neurology, as opposed to the neurology case studies for the unwashed masses that Sacks churned out, Lord Brain's Diseases of the Nervous System ( now in the 12th edition ) is a classic. http://oxfordmedicine.com/view/10.1093/med/9780198569381.001...
If you want to read real neurology, as opposed to the neurology case studies for the unwashed masses that Sacks churned out, Lord Brain's Diseases of the Nervous System ( now in the 12th edition ) is a classic. http://oxfordmedicine.com/view/10.1093/med/9780198569381.001...
> churned out
I think this might explain why what Sacks did was important and not something simply "churned out": https://xkcd.com/397/
I think this might explain why what Sacks did was important and not something simply "churned out": https://xkcd.com/397/
"And now, weak, short of breath, my once-firm muscles melted away by cancer, I find my thoughts, increasingly, not on the supernatural or spiritual, but on what is meant by living a good and worthwhile life — achieving a sense of peace within oneself. I find my thoughts drifting to the Sabbath, the day of rest, the seventh day of the week, and perhaps the seventh day of one’s life as well, when one can feel that one’s work is done, and one may, in good conscience, rest.”