One thing I love about SVGs for websites is their stability across many contexts, browsers, etc. Everything is pinpoint, coordinate based, nothing moves around unexpectedly. You define it once, it's done.
Disagree. It's really not complicated at all to me. Not sure why people make a big fuss over this. I don't want an AI automating which AI it chooses for me. I already know through lots of testing intuitively which one I want.
If they abstract all this away into one interface I won't know which model I'm getting. I prefer reliability.
I hope someone can create an open source replica of this work. I see so much potential for features you can come up with.
For example the rhyming example brings to mind a feature where you give the model starting input and ending input and ask it to fill in.
Can not only imagine it being useful in that sense, but for ways at retroactively arriving at some answer, or solution or something. Like the causal chain that leads to a specific answer.
Another idea is to show all possible word variations, and then the middle is rewritten based on the chosen word.
Don't you think this 'logic' is kind of a numb way to look at reality? Not caring about the actual human doing the job... when you've got millions in your pocket? Standard of living in third world countries tends to be worse. Look at every global human wellbeing index in existence and you'll see they're all pretty much the same map rhymed over and over. People suffer on one side so that people can live well on the other side.
It's not like "Oh their quality of life is exactly the same as in the US it's just cheaper! So it's totally fine for us to pay them peanuts! Right? Peanuts buy you a house there... I mean the house has no plumbing but it's a house!" No, their quality of life is absolute crap compared to first world countries (as someone from a third world country). And paying them like shit will only prolong their suffering.
The least the company could do is pay them fairly which means they can travel or live a better quality life.
Jeff you know what would be magical? Not just vanilla diarization "Speaker 1" and "2" but if the model can know from the conversation this speaker was referred to as "Jeff Harris" or "Jeff" so it uses that instead.
Yep. I've often said RLHF'd LLMs seem to be better at recognition memory than recall memory.
GPT-4o will never offhand, unprompted and 'unprimed', suggest a rare but relevant book like Shinichi Nakazawa's "A Holistic Lemma of Science" but a base model Mixtral 8x22B or Llama 405B will. (That's how I found it).
It seems most of the RLHF'd models seem biased towards popularity over relevance when it comes to recall. They know about rare people like Tyler Volk... but they will never suggest them unless you prime them really heavily for them.
Your point on recommendations from humans I couldn't agree more with. Humans are the OG and undefeated recommendation system in my opinion.
Does anyone know if there's an API where I could plug in ISBN and get all the libraries in the world that have that book?
I know Worldcat has something like this when you search for a book, but the API, I assume is only for library institutions and I'm not a library nor an institution.
Good. Finally they’ll realize the meaninglessness of their work and how they’ve been exploited in the most insidious way. To the point of forgetting to answer the question of what it is they most want to do in life.
The brain does saturate eventually and gets bored. Then the crisis of meaning. Then something meaningful emerges.
We’re all gonna die. Let’s just enjoy life to the fullest.
It may be impossible in this world to expect a form of donation, but it is certainly not impossible to expect forms of investment.
One idea I had is everyone is paid a thriving wage, and in exchange, if they in the future develop their passion into something that can make a profit, they pay back 20% of their profits they make up to some capped amount.
This allows for extreme generality. It truly frees people to pursue whatever they fancy every day until they catch lightning in a bottle.
There would be 0 obligation as to what to do, and when to pay back the money. But of course would have to be only open to honest people, so that neither side is exploiting the other.
Both sides need a sense of gratitude, and wanting to give back. A philanthropic 'flair' "If it doesn't work out, it's okay", and a gratitude and wanting to give back someday on the side of the receiver, as they continue working on probably the most resilient thing they could ever work on (the safest investment), their lifelong passion.
If and only if something like high-paying UBI comes along, and people are freed to pursue their passions and as a consequence, benefit the world much more intensely.