It's not penalizing efficiency, it's taxing a commodity.
Everyone is efficient, thus, the efficiency has to support what we'd call our economy/society.
I can foresee a token tax in the future in some ways, but then that would kill private LLMs if hat came true so i'm not sure anyone has an answer, but neo-luddism seems short sighted.
I spent truckloads of money on home theater and audio systems and have been quite happy with my Sonos.
I have the Sub, The original big play bar and some 1s and I have a record player that plays to sonos and then upstairs I have an Arc.
I've probably got 10 years on this system now and couldn't be happier. I remember having to replace my receivers 2-3 times in a 10 year time frame from failed circuits to needing HDMI to needing a newer HDMI and all that jazz.
My play bar has just been optical out from the TV and it's supported 5.1 audio realy well.
I use the spotify play direct. I'm not a huge fan of the newer app and I wasn't impressed with them EOL'ing products.
With that said, it's been wife and kid approved. Everyone in the house knows how to use it and its been problem free. No wires for my cat to chew on.
There is also a diminished value of mobile phones today vs yesteryear.
* Twitter is dead for all intents and purposes
* Lots of mobile apps are dead/dying and people aren't using them in the same way they used to out of privacy or concerns - such as checking in where you eat or tracking your exercise/fitness. (Nike really screwed the pooch here) and see twitter dead
* New phones just push performance which isn't really needed when people merely surf the web or click a few apps while they take a crap
I'd say a lot of the mobile apps are dead/dying because they gave up on the app store paradigm and went subscription. Take myfitnesspal for example - where its 80 bucks a year to subscribe to use USER GENERATED CONTENT and it isn't shareable because its not an app purchase, but rather a sub. So many apps did this now that the family share is useless..
and lets not forget phones are getting expensive in plans rather than more affordable.. remember the days of cable? that's what carriers like verizon are doing where its hard to avoid disney, hulu or game subs or other crap when you just want a cell phone plan
on windows copilot is built into the task bar with a popout window on right side bar showing output that can work with clipboard. You can talk to it, copy in an image or screenshot and ask for details too. if you prompt for PowerShell it gives you a code block with a copy button. (oh and also reference links to learn more... which is much nice)
No idea. The markets did lunch Meta in the gut today though so who knows what the outcomes will be. It feels like a lot of goodwill but investors don’t agree (even though EPS was up)
They have been heavily subsidized. Throwing them out for free wouldn't do anything for anyone. People attach monetary value to product value intrinsically.
Valve never really tried to compete. Index is old, outdated and never saw a price discount and their supposed Index V2 has been delayed so long it's a huge meme.
HTC never really iterated like Quest did beyond big bulky headsets that required a full room set up did they?
I can't say Meta spending 10s of millions to push the technology forward is monopolistic unless you want to say Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft consoles or any device with a walled garden (ipad/iphone) ecosystem is monopolistic.
As fan of the amazing quest 3, i'm interested in seeing what a "OEM" ecosystem can do.
I do think that stand alone VR is where it's at because it frees you while still being completely capable for PCVR so i'm hopeful some PCVR "first" headsets can join a program like this and deliver on stand alone while still keeping their bread and butter.
Abbott claws back from the population all the time but will never touch businesses. I don't know they received monetary compensation to move here, but they did tear down affordable housing and a few apartment complexes to build their campus here so that sucks.
I find these points are all valid and noble, but I believe it suggests "Mastodon the Social Network" more than "Mastodon the software".
I tend to lean in on "the social network" myself and with that mindset, I'm subscribed to all the recommended groups here eager to see how we can address these.
IBM has left us alone. I don’t get paid by IBM, my benefits are Red Hat, My CEO is Red Hat’s CEO and funny enough when we work with IBM we lead the calls because IBM is letting us do what we do best.
I could sense storage was changing. We had product delays, we kept pushing things out to future releases to expand ODF to our managed services. Evrything was always next quarter. Now it makes sense.
Everyone is efficient, thus, the efficiency has to support what we'd call our economy/society.
I can foresee a token tax in the future in some ways, but then that would kill private LLMs if hat came true so i'm not sure anyone has an answer, but neo-luddism seems short sighted.