It is a separation-of-duties argument for code written by AI agents and also reviewed by the same AI agents.
If you ask Agent1 to write code, the PR diff coming out of it should really be reviewed by Agent2 (or 3 or whatever), the reviewer should be a different system than the code gen agent.
The core claim is that a model is a poor judge of its own work — it shares the same priors and blind spots that produced a bug, so self-review trends toward a shallow review rather than catching blind spots.
The system that writes the code shouldn't also be the thing that signs off that it's safe to ship.
On the flip side, our SaaS runs primarily on GCP so our users are fine. But our billing and subscription system runs on AWS so no one can pay us today.
CodeRabbit has GA'd its support for AI code reviews directly in your terminal. CodeRabbit CLI agent works with your coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, etc.) and allows you to automate code reviews and bug fix right as you are building in your CLI.
To get started, run this command in your terminal ask your coding agent to run CodeRabbit reviews:
curl -fsSL https://cli.coderabbit.ai/install.sh | sh
The real warning sign (like flashing red lights x100) will be when potential AI Inra unicorn startups start delaying their IPOs or their public stock fails to rally after IPO
Hey folks - just wanted to share that CodeRabbit recently shipped AI code reviews for Cursor, Windsurf and VS Code.
In order to have code reviews fit seamlessly into the daily coding work in the editor we had to completely rebuild our AI code review agent so that we could fast, and accurate code reviews in the editor.
Objective was to review every code change well before the PR is raised so that there are fewer comments and back-and-forth in the PR.
Would love to hear your feedback on how we balanced code review quality with speed of delivering review comments.
Hey folks - just wanted to share our announcement that CodeRabbit now runs in the IDE bringing free AI code reviews in the code editor.
No more context switching when conducting code reviews. Developers can maintain their flow state and get immediate feedback on committed or uncommitted changes. Reduces clutter in the PR as well to get your code reviewed before the PR is raised. No cost to run code reviews in the IDE (with some rate limits).
Shouldn't take more than a few minutes to install the CodeRabbit plugin. Would love to hear your feedback.
Every big company i have worked at (2) didn't really reach out to anyone from my previous job to verify my details. Every startup I've worked at (3, all early stage) did extensive background verification on all my claims. Guess the risk for early stage startups getting a new hire wrong is more pronounced.