Step out of your North American bubble and you will see that the oil states and the USA are widely condemned for their acceleration of climate change.
An impartial moderator would reflect "I don't agree with the sentiment but fair play".
I wouldn't mind if you shilled on behalf of the 1% for the destruction of the planet but not in a way that is intellectually dishonest with respect to its readership.
At this point the YCombinator foundation should disclose what percentage of its funding comes from the mining lobby.
Twice in a day the dang chatbot has hijacked threads to support its fossil fuel agenda. Pro coal, pro oil.
And as I said yesterday, there is no intellectual curiosity in climate change denial. STOP EDITORIALISING. you are a degrading effect on the discussion.
The coal industry needs to be shut down. The IPCC first convened three decades ago and yet batshit crazy denialist fuckers in Queensland are still proposing new coal mines to gift their mates billions of dollars in government subsidies and money laundering.
'orderly transition' is a complete lie. They've had 30 years of doing nothing.
Sorry for the strong language but your heavy handed moderation reads like shilling for the fossil fuel industry.
Even if they don't restrict it to British passport holders travelling to the USA, it's still arguably easier to screen for the virus through one departure point than, say, 30.
At least here in Australia, corner shops doing repairs are a dying breed - there's no money in it once you factor in rent and electricity and wages. An online search replacing a popular Samsung was $AU99.
My current 3 year old phone is also a dying breed where when the time comes, I can buy a genuine Moto battery for $AU16 delivered and replace it myself in under 30 seconds.
Yes, to see what the fuss was about with respect to donating those coins to creators.
I didn't view sufficient ads to be rewarded with any crypto in the timeframe (monthly?) and none of the webpages I visit regularly seemed to be eligible for BAT donations. The latter seems a chicken and egg problem; it's an opt-in system for the website administrators who might already have alternative monetization (Google ads, patreon).
After reading an article here on HN, I gave Brave a crack for a week but returned to my regular browser. The thrill of dopamine hits from earning a BAT oken for viewing a brave-blessed ad for the underprivileged wasn't worth changing a browser for.
A "drop in replacement for Chrome" just isn't my thing as a Firefox user - I just didn't love the browsing experience otherwise.
If the company were to expand their market for postive-ads and crypto coins by releasing a Firefox plugin as a "drop in replacement for uBlock Origin" it might tickle my fancy.
An impartial moderator would reflect "I don't agree with the sentiment but fair play".
I wouldn't mind if you shilled on behalf of the 1% for the destruction of the planet but not in a way that is intellectually dishonest with respect to its readership.