I can't tell if this is intended to be read straightforwardly or as satire. The general summary seems to be Labour bad because I dislike Labour decisions
Labour flaws are presented with hyperbole like [demolishing foundations]
While Tory flaws are accompanied with commentary like [it's not perfect, but nothing is]
"I'm getting Facebook ads for something we were just talking about verbally so it must be listening in" has been debunked time and again. Any combination of other browsing based inference, baader meinhof, and pure coincidence would be at play
I think that by "can guess fake words" in the title OP means that the tool can come up with a plausible guess for the etymology, even for fake words. Unfortunately, the more common reading of that phrase is that it can tell fake words from real ones
> They are a net positive by a large margin
Maybe initially. The 'large' margin is getting smaller every day. Pricing is opaque and ever increasing. A subscription is slowly becoming a requirement rather than a ln add on. Most of the price increases are not passed on to the driver. Drivers in most markets are 'independent contractors', which they're realising is a bad deal.
They've only recently moved from market-capture mode to tighten-the-screw mode. Expect the enshittification to accelerate
As a UK resident who's recently given up alcohol, the pub culture part is the thing I miss the most. The quick pseudo-answer is non-alcoholic drinks, but it creates a weird dynamic when most of the group gets slowly inebriated over the evening, and you sip lemonade
I've been looking for something like this (Not for Korean though) and I'd even be happy to pay - though I'd prefer to pay by usage rather than a standing subscription fee.
So far, no luck, but watching this thread!
> the average book should have a 2.5
Disagree on this. This assumes that people read books completely at random. In reality, people read blurbs/summaries or get a recommendation and the typical book you read is likely to be better than the midpoint between the worst book you've read and the best book you've read (I'm assuming a linear scale mental model).
> find out what wall would give me the best alternative path
This, specifically, and the question as a whole are hard to parse as a human. Before clicking through to the SO link (where there seems to be a lot more context), I wouldn't have guessed the problem you were trying to solve.
I'm curious why you changed the prompt at all? Was it to get the model to avoid your question's SO page?