If someone comes forward with legitimate good security vulnerabilities and you don’t pay out, you’re massively encouraging them to go to shady brokers next time.
There are a load of criticisms you could call out about google, but suggesting that their “one primary platform and single focus (social media)” is about to collapse is not valid; they’re far too broadly invested (from mobile phones to search to email) to claim they’re about to become irrelevant.
> Just go sit somewhere and turn your attention inwards
Perhaps you were born with a natural instinct for what meditation is, what to do when thoughts arise and you go off track, how to sit comfortably, what you’re aiming for and what you’re not.
But I didn’t, I needed to read books to start my development. I absolutely don’t think children should know this.
Yeah it seems like RCE in the context of Chromium, but not SQLite? I know it’s pedantic but if this is RCE in SQLite because it’s exposed to the network via other software, every vulnerability is “remote” because you may expose it via other software.
Good question, to which I don’t know the full answer. But if you look at their motto “move fast and break things”, insistence on pushing new features as fast as possible, and the recent clash and resignation of their CSO, I’d say google are just more mature about security, and understand their products are entirely reliant on trust of their users.
I highly doubt this is a off the shelf Wordpress install. In fact, a standard WP is not > 1gb of data, which the post describes.
There will be a massive amount of customization, so revealing source code probably is a security risk. I’m willing to bet a competent code auditor could find secondary vulns in that code.
There’s IBB; the internet Bug Bounty. But it’s for widespread open source software. Typically FOSS that isn’t well funded yet is critical to massive parts of the internet. Popular libraries, email & DNS infrastructure etc.
Ebay being a private company with boatloads of money is definitely not a part of that.
Sure, that’s a great idea. But your transport security is going to show vulnerability sooner or later (see: regular issues in TLS), and it’s worth having a slightly less compromised network fabric.
Excuse my very basic question, but how do you manage spam when using mutt? Do you interface to a cloud-based service in mutt, or have some kind of other spam filter?
I’ve always liked the idea of moving my email to mutt and using personal domains, but not convinced I could manage spam well.
Did you do the DLND? If so, they may have updated the videos, as the current explanation of conv2d_transpose seemed fairly clear to me. Or maybe it was some of the extra materials they provided that helped. I think I found a good video on YT also.
I don’t believe your statement that AI is just a subset of software. It’s almost entirely math. Furthermore, “somebody like yourself or anybody else can’t pick it up” is wildly untrue. You realize that the people in the articles are researchers, not practitioners, right? They’re the Albert Einstein’s of the industry dreaming up new deviations and architectures. I think you’re severely downplaying what they’ve achieved.
You might as well say that Michael Schumacher just drives a car pretty well, so most of us could spend a bit of time in training and win F1
The reason I go out of my way to insist I can’t do that is that I’m not in my 20s, and it would be delusional of me to think AI is “nothing magic” and I can watch some YouTube videos to become the worlds best.
“and soon Google” links to a complete unsupported fluff piece from November, drawing a loose connection to an activist investors letter.