Can't believe it's come down to this in 2026, but if this does not beep incessantly and slam on the brakes when maneuvering around some foliage I'm all in.
I meant it when I said these smaller models are great. They open up entirely new use cases and I appreciate the work that went into creating them.
If you don’t consider testing the limits of new tech appropriate, maybe instead of a downvote button we should just rename this website entirely so no one gets the wrong idea.
My point was to illustrate that our physics models don't agree on the nature of this expansion (Hubble tension) so using it to dismiss the fact that the observable universe is dense enough to form an event horizon seems like a stretch.
> Equating the Schwarzschild radius for a given blob of matter with the event horizon of a black hole requires that the matter be static or collapsing.
If the space containing the matter is stretching does that still count as expansion?
> Because this storage system’s query language is more powerful than the underlying one’s, its read operations in general may overfetch and then filter results.
Seems like this is the crux of the problem. Migrating and/or replicating data to an underlying data layer that supports the required query logic probably makes more sense?
This would be an awesome feature. It would be a good resource for plant identification and I won't inadvertently introduce an invasive species into my local environment.
I can't bring myself to believe that bollards are the answer. Placing them everywhere would be exceptionally expensive. Emergency vehicles would get stuck in traffic more often. Car accidents involving bollards would be more dangerous to drivers and do more costly damage to cars.
While I agree that pedestrian lives would be saved, the net cost to human life likely remains unchanged.
Very cool graphic. However emphasizing the juxtaposition between pictures of wood joints on the internet and actual real-life wood joints with the phrase "digital" is a bit perplexing.
1. The teacher forgot to include that the University wants 100 responses to the survey.
2. Missing answer C likely contains something like "Randomly select 14 more students to receive the survey"
That makes it an actual statistics question, you'd need to calculate the response rate from the original 120 and then compute the additional solicitations required to meet the response count goal of 100.