> The results of a study published by the journal Human Cell "suggest, for the first time, that inhalant CBD can impede lung cancer growth by suppressing CD44 and angiogenesis."
> I'd say that whatever they're doing, it seems to be fairly effective.
It's a police state with an ongoing alcohol prohibition, tremendous amount of road blocks in the capital and night club bouncers having to have basic police training. Compared to Estonia where there's almost no cops visible, no no-go zones and very little crime - Sweden isn't doing that well.
> This article doesn't really explain _why_ eating earlier is supposedly better.
I feel like it's a personal preference and I only eat later in a day, but here[1] you may find some explanations on why eating in the morning may be better.
"Evaluating the impact of cannabinoids on sleep health and pain in patients with chronic neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials"
I doubt it. Ads aren't the only thing driving spyware surveillance. Governments benefit from it, too. EU is cutting the information flow to the US, while creating it's own Great Firewall at the same time.
BTW, the term was crafted by Shoshana Zuboff, author of "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism"[1]
Substances are tested and when it is found that they have beneficial effects on certain conditions, outweighing negative side-effects in individuals with these conditions - they are accepted for use after clinical phases.
Would you rather have no meds for some conditions because we don't fully understand how existing ones work, or would you dissect living humans' brains for faster research?
Psychiatry barely understands HOW exactly many prescription meds work so don't expect exact answer on how non-prescription substances work.
But if approached properly, single session with psychedelics may have beneficial effects of months or even years of psychotherapy. Week or two after such session you start noticing that some things simply stopped being problematic.