After a quick scan, Arcan seems to be pushing a microkernel approach, with some clients providing display server capabilities and others talking to them via shared memory. This will have the same problem as all other microkernels - nice for research, but the extra completely outweights the marginal benefits over a monolithic thing that generally has a smaller API surface to maintain.
Wayland design choices are heavily influenced by automotive and TV where it has been industry standard way before it became mostly usable as a desktop. And that has lead to design compromises that look odd on desktop.
But hey, you can probably run automotive UIs with your desktop compositor.
And Gnome devs are just being silly at this point.
The NAT firewalls do not like P2P UDP traffic.
Majoritoy of the routers lack the smarts to passtrough QUIC correctly, they need to treat it the same as TCP essentially.
The minimum run time of a tread before it's potentially preempted when load is high is computed based on number of cores available giving more time when there are more cores since rescheduling latency is apparently longer with more cores.
And the function that does this uses the same value for 8 and more cores.
Bicycles fail safe unless a wheel falls off or both brakes fail simultaneously.
Balancing onewheelers - if the control or power system fails, you immediately go down, hard. And since the cruising position is weight shifted forwards, it's 100% nose dive.
There is a significant overap - fuel up, find the restroom, grab some snacks.
EV chargers have the benefits of being cheap, take little space, and permitting is raesonably simple. Expecting them to be way more widespread than fuel stations ever can be.
That GPU firmware is generally just a blob that has never been open sourced. The driver is the part that talks to the GPU, not the OS that runs inside the GPU. Unless I'm mistaken in which case this would be a huge deal.
For most use cases shortest path is super simple and fast problem on modern PCs. So might be useful on extra large synthetic networks.
Neural nets?, Trading logs?, Image processing?
Also negative weights are rare in real life applications. And def not in what you would consider normal path planning.
That sounds very wrong.
Not a physicist, but light does not interact with magnets, or you need to get into the superconducting strength levels before it does.
DOS programs loaded fast, since there was around 1MB of working memory. Granted they did not do much, but where responsive, except when needed to do real compute, then you just waited forever.
Windows 3x/9x with first real multitasking and swap - things got quite sluggish. Early browsers were particularly eager of gulping ram and bringing everything to halt.
Nowdays it feels somewhere in the middle with copious amounts of ram stuff can be fast once up and running, but it seems every app either wants to load from web on every step or tries to index your drive on every keypress.
The accuracy figures in TA are kinda low - 99.7 for the top one, averaging out at 98.5%.
Anyone has some idea what is this measuring?
Bit accuracy (way too low)? A full disk read 100% error free? The actual accuracy really depends on the quality of the disc, is this measured with a reference disc?