Then you grossly misunderstand how far along AI is. AGI is not even a remote possibility with current techniques and implementations (and I would contest, entirely impossible with digital logic). It's just massive amount of statistics that were computationally impossible given available hardware until recently.
We don't have a baseline understanding of consciousness or intuition to a degree that we could even begin to replicate it.
Which modern, high quality of life, non capitalist countries are less harmful to the environment?
>You have no scruples at all do you? "No insight into" then you go on avoiding the point and just falsely suggesting that I said something I didn't say (treating all historical North American societies as one, which is ridiculous), what a deeply dishonest thing to write, shame on you.
What was your point then? You were leveraging some native American sentiments and factually incorrect popular myths on their beliefs about property ownership to contend falsely that they had better economic systems devoid of profit motive or property.
>I won't be wasting energy on replies that have zero prospect of breaking through that dogma. I can see others have tried with no success.
The irony coming from someone with entirely unsourced, repeatedly demonstrably false assertions, while I have provided endless examples and sources.
Sorry, not sorry for sticking to my well researched and verbosely sources principles and reasoning because random strangers on the internet regurgitate easily countered dogma from ideologues and propagandists.
I can tell you exactly what evidence would look like that would change my mind about any topic I hold strong beliefs about. Meanwhile you can't even stick to one topic.
Exactly, and I would be remiss to leave out in an absurdly short period of time on the scale of human history. It's so far beyond coincidence it's laughable to contend that it might be.
The overwhelming majority of ethical and moral progression in human history coincided with the extension of private property rights to more and more of the general population, and retracted when those rights were rescinded.
This occurred both because of the recognition of humanity that goes along with granting these rights, and the technological progressions enabled by allowing opportunity and innovation to occur in larger swaths of the population rather than an aristocratic hyperminority.
lol two of the sources are literally post graduate level efforts, ironic given your fifth grade teacher comment.
You don't know what primary evidence means. I've linked several sources that include indisputable, concrete evidence, including verified CCP documents, as well as eye witness, first party testimony that maintains consistency across accounts from entirely different people.
Describe evidence sufficient to your standards and provide rebuttals to the evidence provided. I know you can't and won't do either of these things, I'm just explicitly demonstrating the intellectual dishonesty you're employing to minimize the horrors of the CCP.
Your contentions don't hold up to even the most basic scrutiny or challenge.
We don't have a baseline understanding of consciousness or intuition to a degree that we could even begin to replicate it.