I like this article but this is actually a good point. "The rich" is mostly used in a negative way.
I'd argue this is because most attempts to reduce large groups of people to an idea like "the rich" or "the poor" are done in bad faith.
A support of this would be, within academic sociology or economics these terms will be used in a non slur way and it's because they actually have a reason to be thinking in terms of these groups instead of throwing them out as stawmen for some argument
The entire top level point of the article, the part that is literally the focus of the title, is a recommendation not to call groups by names they don't like.
Did you read the article? Or did you read the first two paragaphs and decide it was wrong thought and go to yell to the internet?
You are just encouraging fake news. Please don't ask people to substantiate anecdotes. It's better to just accept the narrative if it fits the consensus.
This obsession with "proof" and "data" is anti scientific.
Imagine being simple enough to buy this narrative wholesale.
There's one objectively correct version of understanding the world and the important idea is to camp people into binary groups of "believes correct news" or "believes fake news"
Realtors And especially real estate brokers, have ripped apart our society with cartel like tactics so they can grab a few percent on each bit of the destruction.
I hope the book is thrown at them as harshly as possible.
Claw back those earnings and put it into funds to clean up the mess that has been made