I've written a (very long) article on AI as Interpolatable Archives, which are shapeshifting skeleton libraries, cognitive catalysts which can be used like explosion drawings, bearing cognitive hazards and new opportunities to play.
It traces the history of fuzzy archives back to Aby Warburgs Mnemosyne Atlas and Borges and goes on to explain the various effects on learning, including chances and risks, and dissects various points of critique from delusions to parrots, some of which prevail, many of which vanish, once you strip AI from cognitive woo.
Ofcourse this article rubs the open source dogma believers here the wrong way and i'll get downvoted to hell, but i wholeheartedly agree with the author, and i think that you guys don't get what AI-systems are, at their basic level.
The are information interpolators, and all the information you can interpolate from the training data is readily present in latent space, waiting to be discovered by a prompt.
There is this argument: But but you can find a bomb instruction in a chemistry textbook. No, you can't. Without checking this, but i think you'll have a hard time finding any chemistry textbook that explicitly gives you a bomb instruction. Ofcourse, yes, you can find all the information necessary to build that bomb in that text book, but the key difference to a latent space full of interpolated data points is that: You have to sit down, find that information that is scattered throughout that textbook, write it down, interpolate that knowlegde yourself, write that down, and then you have a bomb instruction -- except you'll have written it for yourself.
Not so with latent spaces. The bomb instruction is already there, interpolated from all the data points, just waiting to be prompted, and that is easy peazy with, yes, open source models.
So spare me the whining about anachronistic software dev dogmas from the 90s and arrive in the present, pretty please.
Agreed, but to tackle the problem from that perspective would require making LLMs a public good, preferably run by the state, akin to public libraries. This could not only solve for the copyright problem, the state may even make it mandatory for publishers to contribute their published writings to the public LLMs. I'm sure libertarian tech bros have that in mind when they insist on open source development (which then opens another whole can of worms when you consider interpolative knowledge as intellectual nuclear fission, but that's another story).
1. Przybylski again. He continues to generalize from studies focussing on screentime that everything digital is harmless, including social media. I don't trust his work.
> The evidence review, published today in Early Education and Development, is an analysis of 33 studies which use neuroimaging technology to measure the impact of digital technology on the brains of children under the age of 12. In total, more than 30,000 participants are included.
> In particular, the research finds screen time leads to changes in the pre-frontal cortex of the brain, which is the base of executive functions such as working memory and the ability to plan or to respond flexibly to situations. It also finds impacts on the parietal lobe, which helps us to process touch, pressure, heat, cold, and pain; the temporal lobe, which is important for memory, hearing and language; and the occipital lobe, which helps us to interpret visual information.
> "It should be recognized by both educators and caregivers that children's cognitive development may be influenced by their digital experiences," says the study's corresponding author, Chair Professor Hui Li, from the Faculty of Education and Human Development Faculty of Education and Human Development, at The Education University of Hong Kong.
Really good free fonts are as rare as unicorns. One can spot good fonts by looking at the kerning, and most if not all free fonts suck at kerning, including Google Fonts.
Reminds me of social media utopianism at the beginning of the blog era. More communication is better, more connections are better, and it gave is this world. So no, cheaper and more widely available is not always better.
I got psychologically abused in a very extreme form by everyone i liked 5 years ago, hackers and sex and feminism and trolls are involved ofcourse, and all that got me through that was humor. If i didnt have that, I'd have killed myself. Fuck those tasteless assholes some of which called themselves "friends" for what they did, but I like movies and i love music, and I still got those even when I lost everything else including my flat, my library, my job, every friend in this city, every professional contact and all hope about any future. Now I live in a homeless shelter (i was a respected nationally known blogger once) and I still write and have found something like new friends here. I laugh every day, and I bet i laugh much louder than those traitorous assholes. Everything is better than the Chaos Computer Club and the Berlin Elite and their aristocratic secret society that treats people like animals, if the people perpetrating the violence are female and leftwing enough. This is the truth. They know it, I know it, everybody knows it, nobody talks about it, because it isnt allowed what cant be. Humor, my dude. Get a bunch of these, they work wonders.
Yes, so much this. And one of your links mentions 1998s movie "The Wedding Singer" with Adam Sandler, a soundtrack full of 80s-hits and a very old Billy Idol in a guest role at the end. This was about the start of the 80s-nostalgia that never really faded until this day.
I think something is very off about nostalgia these days and my best guess is that digital networks alter the way our collective memory works.
>There’s a reason that the culture of the 1980’s is experiencing a resurgence right now.
I stopped reading right there. The first signs of 80s-nostalgia went off in the electro nostalgia in electronic music circles around the year 2000, just a few years later we had 80s-shows on mainstream TV in germany, nonstop.
The 80s-Nostalgia-Trip itself is running for 20 years now and normal nostalgia cycles can't explain this phenomenon.
Interesting. Twitter early kicked open standards in the nuts, so I understand everyone who's sceptical to say the least. But if they manage to detangle that ugly mess that is the Fediverse this could be a real and good step into the right direction.
LOL imagine the userbase of the internet has increased by a thousand thousand billion times since then. Thats what you apologists don't get: It's not about a single Dick on the Web. It's about a mass of Dicks. Its a problem, get that into your head.
It traces the history of fuzzy archives back to Aby Warburgs Mnemosyne Atlas and Borges and goes on to explain the various effects on learning, including chances and risks, and dissects various points of critique from delusions to parrots, some of which prevail, many of which vanish, once you strip AI from cognitive woo.
This is the whole piece (14k words no less): https://goodinternet.substack.com/p/on-interpolatable-archiv... and it contains links to its 4 parts, if you like to read in smaller chunks.
It was quite a lot of work over some weeks, and I hope you guys appreciate. Feedback welcome.