New government of Ukraine is neonazi, installed by the US during this winter. This is done second time. First time it happened in 2004, why american citizen Uschenko has imposed antisoviet propaganda in the school program, the WWII nazi criminal, Stepan Bandera, was made a national hero. It was indoctrinated a neonazi idea that russians are inborn slaves and biogarbage, russian language was banned. Antisoviet/antirussian brainwashing was absolutely successful but economic programme has failed. Therefore Uschenko has lost the office. But, in 2013, US has re-installed its puppet government in the Ukraine again, by force. How do you react?
The new government was much more neonazi (look for "svoboda" party and "far right groups patrolling Kiev"). The first law was to ban the russian language again. They have declared that they will remove the russian fleet (which is located in crimea forever, since Crimea is another Russian land, attached to Ukraine by mistake by Soviet Authority, when ). Now, how do you prove that Russian people (the total population of the Crimea, Doneck, Odessa) should welcome the US-installed russophobic mankurts in Kiev, who chant "slotter the russians" (https://www.google.ee/search?q=москалей+на+ножи) in their fascist marches? You do not bother to prove that. Your propaganda has already put all shit in your head.
1. Russian people in the Ukraine (almost the half of the pouplation) have all the right to run away from your neonazi puppets.
2. They have full right to live with other russians.
3. Russia has all the right to meet the aspirations of frightented people in Ukraine and defend its national interests, which are the Black Sea fleet, russian population united with the rest of the Russia and no NATO in the Ukraine.
You dehumiliate the russian hostages in Ukraine because you want the whole Ukraine to go under Western domination. You want it to separate from the Russia because (as Bzhesinzki puts that) Russia will loose its ability to stand against US Empire only if it looses the Ukraine. You is an imperialist, brainwahsed by the Western propaganda. Crimea has came back home. The "Independent Ukraine" is American, anti-Russia project. The population is russian and feels bad there. It must be ukrainized, turned into ukranians (anti-russians). All russian regions must return back to Russian home, immediately. Start respecting territorial integrity of Sovient Union, not Ukraine. Russia should not let the NATO to expand and install anti-Russian missles in Crimea and Ukraine. Russia did not attach its parts to Ukraine for that. Nato wants the russians to be separated, to live outside the Russia.
New government of Ukraine is neonazi, installed by the US during this winter. This is done second time. First time it happened in 2004, why american citizen Uschenko has imposed antisoviet propaganda in the school program, the WWII nazi criminal, Stepan Bandera, was made a national hero. It was indoctrinated a neonazi idea that russians are inborn slaves and biogarbage, russian language was banned. Antisoviet/antirussian brainwashing was absolutely successful but economic programme has failed. Therefore Uschenko has lost the office. But, in 2013, US has re-installed its puppet government in the Ukraine again, by force. How do you react?
The new government was much more neonazi (look for "svoboda" party and "far right groups patrolling Kiev"). The first law was to ban the russian language again. They have declared that they will remove the russian fleet (which is located in crimea forever, since Crimea is another Russian land, attached to Ukraine by mistake by Soviet Authority, when ). Now, how do you prove that Russian people (the total population of the Crimea, Doneck, Odessa) should welcome the US-installed russophobic mankurts in Kiev, who chant "slotter the russians" (https://www.google.ee/search?q=москалей+на+ножи) in their fascist marches? You do not bother to prove that. Your propaganda has already put all shit in your head.
1. Russian people in the Ukraine (almost the half of the pouplation) have all the right to run away from your neonazi puppets.
2. They have full right to live with other russians.
3. Russia has all the right to meet the aspirations of frightented people in Ukraine and defend its national interests, which are the Black Sea fleet, russian population united with the rest of the Russia and no NATO in the Ukraine.
You dehumiliate the russian hostages in Ukraine because you want the whole Ukraine to go under Western domination. You want it to separate from the Russia because (as Bzhesinzki puts that) Russia will loose its ability to stand against US Empire only if it looses the Ukraine. You is an imperialist, brainwahsed by the Western propaganda. Crimea has came back home. The "Independent Ukraine" is American, anti-Russia project. The population is russian and feels bad there. It must be ukrainized, turned into ukranians (anti-russians). All russian regions must return back to Russian home, immediately. Start respecting territorial integrity of Sovient Union, not Ukraine.
New government of Ukraine is neonazi, installed by the US during this winter. This is done second time. First time it happened in 2004, why american citizen Uschenko has imposed antisoviet propaganda in the school program, the WWII nazi criminal, Stepan Bandera, was made a national hero. It was indoctrinated a neonazi idea that russians are inborn slaves and biogarbage, russian language was banned. Antisoviet/antirussian brainwashing was absolutely successful but economic programme has failed. Therefore Uschenko has lost the office. But, in 2013, US has re-installed its puppet government in the Ukraine again, by force. How do you react?
The new government was much more neonazi (look for "svoboda" party and "far right groups patrolling Kiev"). The first law was to ban the russian language again. They have declared that they will remove the russian fleet (which is located in crimea forever, since Crimea is another Russian land, attached to Ukraine by mistake by Soviet Authority, when ). Now, how do you prove that Russian people (the total population of the Crimea, Doneck, Odessa) should welcome the US-installed russophobic mankurts in Kiev, who chant "slotter the russians" (https://www.google.ee/search?q=москалей+на+ножи) in their fascist marches? You do not bother to prove that. Your propaganda has already put all shit in your head.
1. Russian people in the Ukraine (almost the half of the pouplation) have all the right to run away from your neonazi puppets.
2. They have full right to live with other russians.
3. Russia has all the right to meet the aspirations of frightented people in Ukraine and defend its national interests, which are the Black Sea fleet, russian population united with the rest of the Russia and no NATO in the Ukraine.
You dehumiliate the russian hostages in Ukraine because you want the whole Ukraine to go under Western domination. You want it to separate from the Russia because (as Bzhesinzki puts that) Russia will loose its ability to stand against US Empire only if it looses the Ukraine. You is an imperialist, brainwahsed by the Western propaganda. Crimea has came back home. The "Independent Ukraine" is American, anti-Russia project. The population is russian and feels bad there. It must be ukrainized, turned into ukranians (anti-russians). All russian regions must return back to Russian home, immediately. Start respecting territorial integrity of Sovient Union, not Ukraine.
> Provocation: Letting Ukraine voluntarily choose closer ties with the West
, Learn how the "voluntary" choice is imposed on the Ukranie. Member the Maidan, totally supported by west to capture power in Kiev. They did it violently, using neonazi squads on the streets. Now, the russian TV, history and language is banned in Ukraine, which means that everything is ready for the "voluntary" choice. Member Nuland in Youtube dictating who will be the next prime minister in Ukraine. This is how "voluntary choices" are made.
> Not Provocation: Invading and annexing the Crimea
you. Say that: "Russuans (the population of Crimea) are biogarbage and have no right to make their choice".
V Suvorov is a pseudohistorian, like Solzenicin. Both were used as antisoviet propagana means and proved liars. If you want antirussian (anticommunist) myths, you read Victor Suvorov.
I have told you that chinees consume much less oil but produce much more than US citizen. The oil is consumed by consumer, not by producers.
The notebook is tens of times cheaper than car alone (needs tens of times less materials/energy to produce). It consumes tens of times less energy, which can be not oil whereas cars are addicted to oil. These are cars that deplete the oil and without it you won't have the gadgets.
You neither cannot think not read. You seem to be an ideal consumer. You do everything (and all you do is twisting, comparing incomparable) to have no gadgets in the future.
The Empire was always good at smashing worker interests. But, car manufacturers have no future anyway. The party is over.
> The vote had faced resistance from Republican politicians, who argued it would slow economic growth.
The problem is that we consider growth and consumption of cars and households as "a fucking dandy" (c, George Carlin) drivers of your economy. They are not a solution. They are deseases of our environment,
, including economy.
www.youtube.com/results?search_query=exponential+growth+oil+postcarbon
Your hoarse, Mr Oil, is over. You have finished him. Yet, you seem to with the continuation of the party. The manufacturers have no future. The sooner you understand this the higher is the chance that you will have one.
Learn what "manufacturing consent" and mind control is, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQhEBCWMe44. The fact that people speak about funny stories about their president as a proof freedom of speech just proves that they have no idea what does it mean.
This has nothing to do with sugar. Regarding the cardio-vasculous system, the viscous fats (everything besides the plant oil and fish fat) are really dangerous. I feel the chalestirol clogging my vessels every time I eat the viscous fats.
This makes the heat distribution a joke. In the urban sprawl you use gas to heat the building and water. Do not try to cheat me. At first, heat power plants can "recover" the heat only when you have vertical cities in the cold regions. Then indeed you can supply the heat as byproduct to the city. However, the car infrastructure assumes that you have a horzontal city (aka urban sprawl). You loose much more in the electric transformations that I have described than "recover" from these conversions. How safe is nuclear, you may ask Bellarussians. The Japaneese managed to contaminate a the immense Pacific ocean with a single nuclear plant!
"I think you should do some reading, then. The basic problem is the ever-growing pile of radioactive waste that no-one can get rid of. And as we keep seeing, no-one can effectively contain it either. http://sustainability.stackexchange.com/questions/2396/accou... -- What do you think is he talking about? I have not yet considered the costs of uranium mining.
Now, you propose to replace all fossil power (which is 90%) by atomic, you'll have the disasters 10 times faster. Do you know when we have the peak Uraneum? Squash that peak moment and you'll know that we have no more than 20 years of nuclear fuel.
So, who do you try to cheat? The electric cars are only compatible with sustainability when you they are used only for special services (e.g. ambulance or agriculture but biofuel can be used there) rather than by general population.
The Noble Prise winner runs the empire, to stay dominating the world. It is important to keep the War Machine operating and war non-stopping. BTW, do you remember he got the Noble price for withdrawing the troops and closing the Guantanomo base? How can we help this Empire in the Syria and Ukrane? We cannot accomplish the Russia and Iran without taking these countries first. I see that EU supports the Ukranian nazi fighting the kremiln dictator in Ukrane and Syria while defeating the social worker uprisal against privatization and bunkrupcy in Bosnia, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26093160
> For the time being, we don't have the infrastructure to support solely public transportation, so in the meantime it is reasonable to use electric vehicles.
You put everything upside down. You do not have the efficient infrastructure _because of automobiles_ and, by representing automobiles as something recycled, your perpetuate this wasteful infrastructure.
Wow you reading Yergin's "The Prize", which won the Pulitzer Prize award and think that you know everything about the oil. You is actually an idiot. I can recommed you Jarred Diamond, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse:_How_Societies_Choose_... who also had his, how do you call it, the Pulitzer prize. This proves everything. Keep denying the obvious. This was proven useful.
> You're the one doing "manipulation". You made the bold statement that "ALL"
You is imbicillic criminal, not able to understand the message, after I chewed how ALL is consumed by cars? I have told you not to approach me before you figure out the %% of oil "spent on the fertilizer".
How does it make coal or atomic energy more efficient than oil? You get electricity by burning them. When you burn either coal or oil, you loose 70% of energy. Then, you loose delivering the electric power and charging the accumulators. Finally, you have losses in the electric car. You are left with at best 10% of what the coal has supplied. Oil is higly concentrated energy. It could provide you 30% of the energy it contains into kinetic energy of the vehicle.
So, which efficiency are you talking about? Is it the efficiency of warming the planet up? You are on the right track! Burning more carbon fuel is what we crucially need in our age of peak-everything!
That is a good manipulation. I do not think that this is a joke becaus you must know that the major manufacturer is the China yet the major oil conumers are Europe and US, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_oil_consum.... The consumers consume 15 times more oil per capita than average chaneese (and 3 times more in absolute figures). So, you do not need the oil to produce. You need it to consume.
> It goes into farming, fertilizers are often oil based.
How can you respond such things on the video that I have linked? The western lifestyle assumes that you free-ride a car and live in the suburb. You need a suburb to free-ride a car. This is where all oil goes into. If you rebuild your city into sustainable one, as suggested, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugv0OY6LyuE, you can reduce your oil consumption tens of times. This would cut not only gasoline but also all other expenditures, including car building (this is a major job in the industry, accroding to the 2008 crisis) road building, lighting, other communications and water pipelines, and even home heating, http://sustainability.stackexchange.com/a/2398/476 correspondingly. So, all the resources are consumed by car. The gadgets are orders of magnitude chaper for the environment and do not need the costly subrubs to exist.
The planes are of the same kind. They are a part of your american car lifestyle. They are a stupid waste of the oil when there is a train that is 1000 times more energy efficient (and does not need any oil), once you have a railroad.
So, I am saying that there is no way you can sustain your car. But, the micro-electronics is the tip of the human civilizaiton and you have a choice: either you give up the car right now and keep developing the high-tech or keep driving the car and loose both after 20 years (or may be sooner). If the latter happens, the civilization will never recover since there is won't be any oil in the world anymore.
This is what I say. But, instead of listening that great insight, you feel necessary to support your catastrophic way of life, where you are going to loose everything.
90% is fuel. Thanks for making me an idiot. You should add that burning that oil in your car helps the gandgets to sustain. You afford much more gadgets to yourself, once the car finishes burning all your oil. Right?
New government of Ukraine is neonazi, installed by the US during this winter. This is done second time. First time it happened in 2004, why american citizen Uschenko has imposed antisoviet propaganda in the school program, the WWII nazi criminal, Stepan Bandera, was made a national hero. It was indoctrinated a neonazi idea that russians are inborn slaves and biogarbage, russian language was banned. Antisoviet/antirussian brainwashing was absolutely successful but economic programme has failed. Therefore Uschenko has lost the office. But, in 2013, US has re-installed its puppet government in the Ukraine again, by force. How do you react?
The new government was much more neonazi (look for "svoboda" party and "far right groups patrolling Kiev"). The first law was to ban the russian language again. They have declared that they will remove the russian fleet (which is located in crimea forever, since Crimea is another Russian land, attached to Ukraine by mistake by Soviet Authority, when ). Now, how do you prove that Russian people (the total population of the Crimea, Doneck, Odessa) should welcome the US-installed russophobic mankurts in Kiev, who chant "slotter the russians" (https://www.google.ee/search?q=москалей+на+ножи) in their fascist marches? You do not bother to prove that. Your propaganda has already put all shit in your head.
1. Russian people in the Ukraine (almost the half of the pouplation) have all the right to run away from your neonazi puppets. 2. They have full right to live with other russians. 3. Russia has all the right to meet the aspirations of frightented people in Ukraine and defend its national interests, which are the Black Sea fleet, russian population united with the rest of the Russia and no NATO in the Ukraine.
You dehumiliate the russian hostages in Ukraine because you want the whole Ukraine to go under Western domination. You want it to separate from the Russia because (as Bzhesinzki puts that) Russia will loose its ability to stand against US Empire only if it looses the Ukraine. You is an imperialist, brainwahsed by the Western propaganda. Crimea has came back home. The "Independent Ukraine" is American, anti-Russia project. The population is russian and feels bad there. It must be ukrainized, turned into ukranians (anti-russians). All russian regions must return back to Russian home, immediately. Start respecting territorial integrity of Sovient Union, not Ukraine. Russia should not let the NATO to expand and install anti-Russian missles in Crimea and Ukraine. Russia did not attach its parts to Ukraine for that. Nato wants the russians to be separated, to live outside the Russia.