That image is clearly photoshopped. The image quality of the tree pixels vs the background, the strange lighting discrepancies and the shadow on bottom left of the planter box that is somehow towards the light.
Look at the transition at 29 seconds in that talk [1]. The clouds are in the same place.
Nice strawman, "if you're against X you MUST be against Y".
What really matters is the cost-to-benefit ratio. A jab in the arm vs denying someone immigration, decide whatever you want but it's a sliding scale, not black-and-white.
Look at the transition at 29 seconds in that talk [1]. The clouds are in the same place.
[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9EuJ9QlikY#t=29
I don't hold anything against the artist though, the article just picked a terrible image to use.