I’d love to hear your domain expertise—specifically which supplements you’d recommend avoiding, which ones are generally worth taking, and whether there are any brands or products you trust. I imagine you’ve picked up a lot of insights beyond the technical side as well.
I think it will be nice if there is a summary of that somewhere on the website. It was the first thing I was looking for.
Can you help me understand, if libraries like pandas and numpy also applies to your comment? Or are they truely optimized and you’re just referring to the standard Python language?
Start by integrating third-party APIs, and later switch to open-source models.
Implement everything using your preferred backend language. After that, connect it to a frontend framework of your choice to create interactive interfaces.
You want use your own data? Put it in a database and connect it to your backend, and run these models on your database.
Once you’ve done this, you’ll have completed your full stack development training.
Some that come in mind, both personally and corporately: 1) data analytic, insights, and visualization, 2) dashboards, 3) knowledge discovery and exploration, 4) education & learning, 5) games
I think what he means is that many of the seminal work related to cognitive science were produced back then. For example, Chomsky, Minsky, John Searle, David Chalmers and many more.
Things still move during winter, just not as much.
Elon had always advocated for a for-profit structure so that OpenAI can raise enough money to achieve its vision. In the email they are discussing how the for-profit structure could work. Nothing wrong with that especially when he was the GP.
> This is not something that corporate America recognizes, and in fact, seems eager to censor and suppress.
Numerous American companies recognize this and are developing services and products tailored to your needs. The comment just above yours highlighted some of these companies.
However, Apple may not be the best-suited company to take action in this regard.
That's not the best conclusion. How many families are pet owners? It's not a hard requirement and it doesn't make sense for it to be a hard requirement.
Seems reasonable but not so friendly in practice. Not everyone can afford to raise a pet due to living conditions, financial reasons, and time and attention.
Edit: "Afford" might not be the best term to use here since it relates to money mainly. "Capacity" might be slightly better.