For what it's worth, I do hate people pasting their AI summaries to the comments. Not only are they adding nothing, they are actively detracting from the conversation; they have just pasted a wall of text without fact-checking it.
And in fact, this "summary" misrepresents the article; it completely ignores the humor and presents it as a serious scientific endeavour.
But judging from the rest of the comments, it seems like most people barely managed to finish reading the title, so perhaps there's no need to worry about them reading this AI slop...
I just wanted to second this recommendation - while the video is nearly an hour long, it feels much shorter and is well worth watching:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kya_LXa_y1E
Isn't this incredibly dangerous? I know everyone likes to pretend they have perfect code coverage, but just ripping stuff out that wasn't called during 'probing' feels like the perfect way to make rare code paths even more dangerous.
RE:Twitter, I suspect that's because Germans get a different report form than other visitors - Germany has some specific laws (e.g. NetzDG) that apply to visitors from Germany, rather than visitors who speak German.
https://danluu.com/ballmer/