He states it clearly in the article: because many women will use the law against to you try an extort money from you. It's well known that the court is heavily biased towards women in any "man vs women" case.
Since mice are not humans the gender of the mice might be irrelevant.
So much nutritional studies have been done on animals and yet we know that different animals react totaly different to eg saturated fats and atherosclerosis.
Animals are a garbage proxy for anything human related.
>> We conclude with recommendations that professional societies in mathematics should sponsor an (international) code of ethics, institutional mission statements for mathematicians and syllabuses for incorporation into mathematics degrees.
Gotta put that subjectivity in mathematics.
Mathematics, as the purest of sciences, cannot have ethics in it. Ethics are a human invention: the laws of the universe have no ethics. They simple "are".
"Put ethics in math" is a veiled way of saying "we will regulate what math is acceptable for you to do and what not".
And since this is an oath this implies you WILL BE PUNISHED FOR BREAKING IT. No more truth, just subjectivity.
The year is 2045: you need to obtain a permission from the European Union Mathematics Ethics Comittee before you are allowed to execute a vector cross product on your CPU in your own code.
Also: medical doctors take the oats. But then the pharma drug rep comes along...
OP here. You are free to feed your children with this new experimental food that has never been consumed at any point of human evolution on this planet.
The last time we tried this expriment with novel new foods 10% of USA got diabetes.
Do tell me how your children will end up in 20 years of this kind of food.
But compared to the communistic forms of socialism? Do look at what shitshow of living and totalitarian condition were in Yugoslavia, USSR, China under Mao etc...
There is also conflation of "bankers hold all the money" as if that is a thing exclusive to capitalism. Look at communist contries: the leaders ARE RICH! Josip Broz Tito, Mao etc...all communist leaders were rich! It's the same thing: Joe Sixpack didn't own much neither in communism nor capitalism.
But in capitalism you the best of the best atleast have a chance to get somewhere by their own above average ability.
>>Some politicians are, as you know, blaming the wealthy people moving.
These politicians truly are the stupidest form of humans alive.
>> “The model in Norway is that everyone should contribute relevant to ability and therefore those that have a greater ability to pay taxes, should pay a little more.”
Since taxes are based on % rich already paid more.
>> The widespread ownership of guns in the United States is the predominant reason we have so much more homicide than the developed countries of Europe and Asia.
Switzerland has the same or even more guns then USA per capita and they don't have these problems.
So the author destroys his entire argument in the 1st two lines.
The cat is out of the box. You really think eg China will also pause this?
Myopic thinking: the country that will have the most powerful AI first will be the leader in everything.
>> If the policy starts with the U.S., then China needs to see that the U.S. is not seeking an advantage but rather trying to prevent a horrifically dangerous technology which can have no true owner and which will kill everyone in the U.S. and in China and on Earth.
Imagine being so naive you belive this could ever happen.
Also: imagine the year is 1900. You are saying that steam power and electricity is causing way too many changes way too fast so they put a moratorium on it until the year 2500.