I find it revealing that while somebody with experience in songwriting finds the result dull and mediocre, I who knows next to nothing in the domain finds its nice and totally fine.
Same goes for other domains: philosophy, coding, writing, ...
It's telling me that this AI can generate content in many domains way better than an untrained human would with minimal efforts, while not (yet?) reaching the level of experts in the domain.
It empowers all the non-experts in these many domains to touch things they never could have before. This is an amazing tool.
This is not claimed by the article afaict. It's stated though that json spec/syntax is simple, and that it's simple as a language; my interpretation is that this means "simple/understandable/predictable for humans".
Wow such a coincidence! I recently toyed on such a spec for my shell prompt task manager https://github.com/netgusto/tax (I display it in my prompt and my tmux session bar, it's nice to keep current work in focus)
I'm certainly going to look into implementing the spec.
Some questions/suggestions:
* do you plan support for text unrelated to tasks ?
* do you plan support for sections / nested sections?
* idea suggestion: in tax (linked above) we use markdown bold to notify "focused" tasks and sections, ie the one(s) that should be front and center; ex:
- [ ] **This is a focused task**
I use it with pi-hole [1], and as a Tailscale [2] bridge.
I tried to use it as an alternative workstation (running on sway over arch); the 4K display output is nice, but limited to 30hz, and the machine just isn't peachy enough for my use-case.