seriously wtf.. it was tldr but amongst anybody who reaches mythical/legendary status we know, implicitly, that the myth isnt the man. i remember learning about gene roddenberry and how he was kind of a pig towards women. but his philosophy was totally against that. i think, in the long run, his philosophy is what is more important. its what deserves being shared and praised, even if the man wasnt quite the living ideal. if we did the opposite, and somehow devalued his ideas because of his faults, i think that would be a tragedy. im not saying we should pretend the faults werent there, but im thinking, telling one of these stories is worth telling and the other, well.. there are probably better things to do