In my experience in corporate companies a lot of "older" employees get laid off because they stagnate and their job performance either plateaus or declines, and they refuse to learn new things.
If you've ever looked up at the sky at night in a dark area I don't think you could honestly say it's "dead emptiness". It's fascinating to gaze up at the stars and taking that away would be a tragedy
If it's meant to be a serious discussion of a topic, why does the video need to start with a visual gag? Moreso why such an asinine gag? I cannot take seriously someone who does not take themselves seriously, it tells me maybe they are not thinking through things as critically as they should.
Turned it off after the first 15 seconds. Why does a video about climate start with a man putting peanut butter on a statue of a dog? How am I meant to take that seriously
> We are right about climate change. Full stop. People who consider that not to be the case are lacking in information, because there are literally dozens of independent lines of evidence that back the conclusion and that have been used to model the current state of the climate.
I think the largest divide is man-made climate change vs not. I agree the climate is changing. I'm not yet convinced we're causing it or we can do anything about it.
What are you on about? That's exactly how honest science works. You said it yourself here:
> They attack the cause of Antarctic sea ice collapse by claming that temperature flux changes in the Antarctic bed are caused by geothermal activity. Scientists investigate, adjust for this variable, and it's still the fact that the brutal increases in atmospheric and ocean temperature are the cause for the collapse. Crickets.
1. Scientists publish findings on climate science
2. Someone says hey this might be incorrect if you haven't considered X
3. Scientists conduct further research while accounting for X
Final result is now more accurate than before the "attacks".
It seems to me the position of climate change proponents is that nothing should be questioned. This is not honest science.