same here. Paying for Pro ($200) but the "try it" link just leads to the Pro sign up page, where it says I'm already on Pro. Hyper intelligent coding agents, but can't make their website work.
Not at all. The model weights and training data remain the same, it's just RAG'ing real-time twitter data into its context window when returning results. It's like a worse version of Perplexity.
The first sentence is right. The second is wrong, as implied by the first. If raising interest rates would exacerbate a recession and thereby unemployment, the fed will not do it just because prices are rising. You are ignoring half of their mandate.
This is flat out wrong. The Fed raises and lowers interest rates to stimulate or tamp down demand. Raising interest rates because prices rise while demand drops due to a trade war would accomplish nothing.
If Bard is using PaLM 2, Google is in serious trouble. Here's its offering for "the simplest PostgreSQL query to get month-over-month volume and percentage change." Note that no actual calculations take place and the query generates a syntax error because it references a phantom column. GPT 3.5 and 4 handle this with ease.
SELECT
month,
volume,
percentage_change
FROM (
SELECT
date_trunc('month', created_at) AS month,
SUM(quantity) AS volume
FROM orders
GROUP BY date_trunc('month', created_at)
) AS monthly_orders
ORDER BY month;
It’s literally addressed in his first bullet point…
“ Response: While there is evidence that some tasks that appear emergent under exact match have smoothly improving performance under another metric, I don’t think this rebuts the significance of emergence, since metrics like exact match are what we ultimately want to optimize for many tasks.”