Well for me in the UK they usually ask if I want to see my "usual" doctor or if I don't care. There is sometimes a longer wait to see my usual one. Usually I want to see the same doctor for an ongoing condition but don't much care if it's something new.
Well graph coloring in a more general sense is used for things like register allocation in compilers. So any proofs or increase in theoretical knowledge in the area could lead to improvements in that area.
I think this looks very good.
The main thing though is that it is opt-in where you want it. If it became the default, or required then it would make the language difficult and unsuitable for many things, but as an option it's great :)
I imagine that once a majority of people are using the google dns servers that everyone seems to advise these days, that google will simply decide to ignore most of this and serve whatever domains they like.
I don't know if this is better!
No, but your compiler MIGHT decide in a future release that it's a whole lot faster to ignore the header files for standards types and definitions and just copy a pre parsed version of the struct into the symbol table when the header is included. It might look at the _t and decide nope, I don't have a definition for this so it's an error, despite your own definitions.
This probably won't happen. But if it does you don't have any grounds for complaint really.
I've done some tiny domain specific interpreters for specialized use in products.
I think I'm going to have to though.
I used to like C++ but I really am not a fan of the direction it's moving in. It used to be a simple "better C" that let you write abstactions over simple code that you could understand how
I've done some tiny domain specific interpreters for specialized use in products.
I think I'm going to have to though.
I used to like C++ but I really am not a fan of the direction it's moving in. It used to be a simple "better C" that let you write abstactions over simple code that you could understand how