I'm wondering why the 'Which GNU/Linux distribution do you use Guix on?' question has answers that sum to less than 40%. I mean, even if most users try guix on the Guix OS and that is trivial, the option should also be visible in the result.
The author is considering streaming the electrical measurement experiments in a day, according to the Zhihu answers.
Since this thread is down from the top, I'm also considering posting another one as soon as the stream link comes out. I'm not sure if this violates the "duplicate" rule of HN, but I think broadcasting such a major physics breakthrough is worth a try.
Thanks, but I simply quote "hint of near-room-temperature superconductivity" from the article. AFAIK the original title still contains too much details (the composition） for general audience on HN. Of course, the way I change the title will result in more clicks, so it could be "clickbait" in a way.
So how do I know that which title serves better? I'll appreciate the comments in this special case if it is hard to say in general.
For those eager to view the authors' opinions, you can probably bookmark the question [0] on Zhihu, with an account (as the site updated a login wall weeks ago) and a Chinese translator.
Update: One of the authors have left official comments there. If you have a real-name authenticated account, you can ask the authors about the thing.
Now that I am really new to HN mechanics, I am wondering how to decide which examples to follow. For example, despite the guideline statements, many threads around blog posts on HN actually use new titles.
One line explainer for non-experts like me: the paper presents a material with strange electric behavior at around 260K (approx. -10 celcius or 10 fahrenheit) that seems to be superconductivity, i.e. near-room-temperature superconductivity.
I haven't tried that, but I've been looking for a voice AI for some time. In my opinion, the AI chatbots in texts that emit some spurious opinions simply compete with search engines (those writing codes have strong advantages though), but a voice AI, which explains to me how anything works while I'm walking outside, has no competitors for now.
They seem to be re-organizing the website structure [1] as well as updating the submitting system [2], and lately they were making some progress [3], but still need a lot of formatting work.
I had a difficult time with both part 1&2 of Day 20. At first I just mentally modeled the circuit as "clock-based" where the Flip-Flops flip only when all previous pulses are processed and a synchronizing clock signal is given,
e.g. a flip-flop (default to low) with 2 input ports, on first clock signal (time 1) both ports receives a low pulse; second clock signal (time 2) the flip-flop inspects 2 inputs and decides to give a low (two flips) at the end.
Frustratingly, this model passes the 2 examples flawlessly but fails for the real input.
Congratulations again for the top story, Daniel! I was hacking on MTGA since you posted this article and spoke a little about that with you on GitHub [0].
For anyone interested, I'm _inactively_ working on an unofficial client of MTGA which does hardly anything meaningful for now. The vision is to provide some automation for playing ranked games and stronger bot opponents. Sadly I was distracted lately away from the project and am still puzzled how to make a good UI to see things clearly. I can't even estimate when it will be barely useful.
Beside that, I'm still very interested in any game hacking story of Daniel and anyone else! Please tell me more about how to spot such bugs, how not to worry being banned after such hacking, how to `disclosing the bug to them` like @aethros commented, how to structure an unofficial card game client, and other stories. Thank you!
Sadly that is exactly my case where it stopped responding. I thought it was your design goal! And I don't want to walk through the adventure again, especially after I jumped off the platforms twice.
What if I send some secret key using such a 'secure' app, and invoke some corporated app to sent large encrypted data? Thus the speed and security will both be granted.
I do recommend the Velocity Raptor as it imposes on me visually on Relativity's time and space magic.