nobody equated china to north korea. the post you are replying to applied equivalent logic to an extreme example (north korea) to show more easily that the logic cannot be correct.
Might make things awkward but grokipedia seems way more informative on this topic to me. But I guess I am unfamiliar with the topic so half of it could be hallucination. Curious if anyone familiar with this subject wants to weigh in?
I've been playing around with this for a few weeks. Newton is a pretty thin wrapper around mujoco-warp, which is trying to port mujoco, originally a CPU sim, over to warp on the GPU. There is also mujoco-mjx for this purpose, but using jax instead of warp. I think mjx/jax has the edge on performance because there are mature RL libraries for jax (brax) and big advantages to using Jax for everything, especially with its ability to "vmap" over each layer of abstraction. But I can see why nvidia wants to move away from IsaacLab using physX+pytorch because physX was made for games and interfacing with it through IsaacSim is a bit of a kludge. And apparently mjx isn't so accurate with collisions because of the way it has to be treated in jax. Pytorch RL works decently with newton/warp, at least they can share GPU buffers and you don't have to copy things back and forth to the CPU, however you can't optimize with cuda graphs past the newton/warp boundary because newton/warp have their own cuda graph capture scheme going on at the same time underneath.
They already have a newton branch of IsaacLab on github but its pretty early for it. I just came across a dope project today that is a different wrapper around mujoco-warp that already mimics IsaacLab's api and you can run some robot environments on it. Clean code too, very promising: https://github.com/mujocolab/mjlab.git
The article makes it sound as if magnetism arises because of a delay in the propagation of the electric field caused by a limit on the speed of light. It's kinda the other way around. Light is a alternating electric field and the speed of it's propagation is limited by the ε0 and μ0 (electric permittivity and magnetic permeability) in Maxwell's equations. From Maxwell you can derive c^2=1/(ε0*μ0). Lorentz and Einstein came along and realized that this changes all of mechanics, and that is special relativity.
wait, we skipped the part where we found out microplastics were bad for you. concerning, yes, but plastic is relatively inert and there's no actual evidence of harm yet.
furthermore, ive never even seen a usb-c connector at an airport or for any public use and i doubt i ever will. hell, even IEC can barely withstand that use case,i usually have to bend my prongs for the plug to stay in. usb-c not gonna make it 3 days.
manufacturer's compliance with the specification has always been a total joke heh. i see what you're saying about the springs, but i shouldn't have brought mating cycles into the discussion. the side plugged into the motherboard should just be secure above all else. i can easily ruin any usb-c connector with just my thumb and index finger. the thickness of the A shell and its square profile prevent it from bending under torque pretty darn well.
perhaps. but thats why you have the C at the other end because it doesnt make sense to be frequently plugging things in and out of the motherboard and and wearing down those connectors.
but i doubt you will get more cycles out of C in real life. that might be what the spec says but given the pitch of the pins on the C connector compared to the A, you have a world of greater tolerance to work with
any device that doesnt need a 20gbps or higher link is better off connected to your motherboard via a usb-a to usb-c cable. the "a" connector has not been deprecated. in some ways it is the superior connector, higher mating cycles, less fragile, less likely to get ripped loose, much more torque required to bend, and so on. the "c" connector is more useful on the opposite end where you will be plugging in and out more frequently.
I won $2000 in a programming competition they held at the embedded linux conference, and they never paid me, even after asking twice. Can't say I've been rooting for them since. Never again will I accept a giant check and be told that the real one will come in the mail!
They ought to use it to make the search better. When the search is bad, the whole internet is bad. Even sites with useful information now have it buried amongst paragraphs of glorified keyword-stuffing... that they probably generated with the help of these LLMs google is busy releasing.