In my experience none of the frontier models I tried (o3, Opus 4, Gemini 2.5 Pro) was able to solve Swift concurrency issues, with or without web search. At least not sufficiently for Swift 6 language mode. They don’t seem to have a mental model of the whole concept and how things (actors, isolation, Tasks) need to play together.
For time tracking with screenshots and advanced tagging based on window titles (and sometimes open documents), there is also ManicTime [1]. I don’t think it has OCR though.
I'm still pretty new to VR and experimenting with a Quest 2 I recently bought out of curiosity really (the tiny price helps; as I'm not planning any extensive/real use, I don't feel like being very valuable product myself).
Anyway, you might want to consider adding your device to the Comparison on Wikipedia? [0]
SONN Patentanwälte | Wien, Austria | Patent Attorney Trainee, Patentanwaltsanwärter_in | Full time (40h) | ONSITE | language skills: German and English both required
Do you have a formal technical or scientific background (MSc or equivalent) and want to become a European and Austrian patent attorney?
Our attorneys and trainees work at the interface between technology and law. You will deal with a broad spectrum of technical innovations and with their legal protection, defense and enforcement for our clients.
We are looking specifically for someone with a background in Computer Science — hence this forum.
Second that. This is THE solution for comparing any two PDFs (image or not). I’ve been using it for years almost on a daily basis. Part of its use is certainly derived from the excellent OCR engine it relies on. Also, this runs fully local, which is critical for legal purposes. (edit for context: I still use v14)
Looks great and really uncomplicated. The demo works flawlessly, including receiving email attachments. Good job!
Love the readability and content of the license terms as well. In particular the parts on software modifications.
One feature that is a show-stopper for our workflow is the possibility of shared drafts, i.e. where an email response can be prepared and stored by one person and later reviewed, perhaps completed, and sent by someone else. Do you think this is something that you might consider adding in the foreseeable future?
I found this to be the only working solution to manage a todo list, where manual scheduling became cumbersome and error prone (often > 50 todos, all of which "asap", but with a wide variety of deadlines (2 days to 3 months) and with very different effort levels between 10 minutes and 10 hours involved). At this level it becomes difficult to give reliable estimates to clients and detect bottlenecks when needing to re-schedule on new and urgent tasks or meetings.
I have tested taskjuggler, but it fails to schedule tasks when a mixture of with/without deadline (end) tasks is provided.
Other todo apps/software do not even try, but only show me the seemingly unsurmountable heap of todos before me with convergent deadlines and no proposed solution.
Only downside though (for me) is, there does not seem to be a (paid) self-hosted (privacy aware) version available.
For me, rspamd with corresponding exim-acls practically solved that issue since 02/2016. Spam is mostly rejected, otherwise tagged (and filtered with dovecot-sieve downstream into a review-box) or - if borderline - greylisted. Have had no false positives I'm aware of and only 1-2 false negatives per week slip through that cascade.
edit: Although some training (i.e. manually moving spam to IMAP-Junk) was necessary during the first few months.
While only working in 1D (up/down for workspaceswitch; left/right for monitor switch), I use a similar "geometric navigation" from within i3 in place of the Meta+Number default shortcuts.
Have you considered Zim (http://zim-wiki.org)?
It seems to check all of your points.
I'm using it heavily for all kind of notes that exceed two lines. It has some amazing plugins too (e.g. For organizing Todo items across the entire notebook).