- Devops / Developer minded SysAdmin: this is a very important role, PUPPET, Chef, AWS, Linux, LXC, OpenVZ. Xen, VMWare, you should just have this immense desire to automate and simplify everything, and be a product person, plan, implement and ship - not a maintainer that lives in their cave until things crash, and apply one off server tweaks.
- Frontend Developer: HTML, CSS, Coffeescript - Familiarity with Node/Ruby/Mongo/Mysql, cool github projects is a plus, have to have your own website when we click your link, it should make us want to hire you.
- Backend Developer: Go, Node,Python,Ruby,Coffeescript, MongoDB, RabbitMQ are the things we use. More you know these, the better. If you miss some, don't worry, if you have a strong OOP background, and designing/working on large scale apps is your thing, just drop me an email.
We're open for remote, part time or full time in San Francisco. Only thing we don't want is that you have multiple clients. You can be a student or very experienced individual, and work for Koding 20 hours a week, or work a day or two. You just shouldn't be managing multiple clients and not show up for Koding because your other client had emergency. We want Koding to be the only thing you think about, when you're not working, when you go to sleep, when you wake up.
At this stage we're more willing to have VERY experienced developers, and we're very generous with rates. Our current freelancers have stocks in the company, we don't favor in house developers (alright, maybe just a little :)). Some of our freelancers make more than those are in the office. Your location has no significance to us, just your work. If your work is awesome, your compensation is equally awesome.
Basically yes. After 10th hire, nobody can hire with a blog post like this, for reasons you've stated, plus, there won't be room for co-founder minded, entrepreneurial folks anymore.
@GulA Thanks for your wisdom (let's reuse this typical i-know-it-all-and-you-dont approach). We're not scaling, if you read the post carefully, you will see that we're looking for the 5th member, and the word 'best' is used correctly. I won't provide additional reading for you, because I don't think you will read them.
awesome. it's not bridge, it's rosetta stone.. this will end religious wars between languages :) will bring them together.. now we can use haskell for X ruby for Y and Z for T. distribute them to different servers. very cool.
thanks for responding, it's nice of you to acknowledge it as a bug, and say you're working on it.
> First of all, writing bug reports to Hacker News is usually a bit like complaining about the government at a bus stop.
just a little note on this one, i've made clear in my original writing this is not hate and i sent an email to substack, and ryan to some others i know. i guess i will send you an email next time as well.
not filing as a bug: you are right, i should have done that.
Buffer<->string conversion is WAY too expensive in Node: yes it is, hope you can make this way better, because we don't want to hit cpu each time we pull data from a e.g. database.
writing it to hackernews/stackoverflow: it's because i'm asking for solutions outside of nodejs domain, varnish,nginx or any other way this issue can be worked around. i'm sure you understand. and this was quite helpful as we're now deploying a few varnish and nginx servers to mitigate this problem.
i wasn't saying nginx is bad (nginx is awesome). i just wouldn't want to deploy and configure nginx with my app, if i can avoid it. in fact i got an awesome suggestion over at stackoverflow, that put the usage down to 0.3% http://d.pr/dXVR
sorry i started it.. i meant perceiving a word as one symbol vs a combination of letters. that will speed up and increase the amount of information we can take in, drastically.
considering we do use few thousand words max, to do 99% of our communication (sorry forgot where i read this article), learn those symbols, your eyes now can see much more at once, and brain can digest accordingly.
this is a serious upgrade folks, not just saying, i've been reading dotsies for a while now, i'm dead serious, this could become what my children will read and write with..
think differently. right now our brain processes letter by letter, with dotsies it will become symbol by symbol. i'm reading it for some time, haven't had that difficulty.
there will always be letters next to it anyway, easy to see the base, if you have to.
100% agreed. being an asshole is one problem, thinking about what's shared, and like you suggest, taking a moment to make sure if our message will be perceived as we intend is another.
i enjoyed this article a while back, it touches on the stuff we'd do better even if we are polite and respectful on the surface.
i think this is more about who is saying "stupid" and how generous they feel about it. there are a few things
- if paul graham says it's stupid it's different than somebody who calls everything stupid.
- calling the owner of the idea stupid.
- plain old hating.
- saying 'stupid' can also be a part of the debate, that's natural.
this is a hard problem to solve, that's why i brought it up. there is definitely not an easy way of saying this is right or wrong, but if community sets its tone, i think participants will try to be a part of that commonality.
and hopfully HN stays 'objective' and within 'reason' with polite, kind, constructive comments. when there are no rules, haters win.
the whole problem i'm describing here is you (codeonfire). and it doesn't surprise me that you don't see it. let me try to show you.
you've wrongly (psycho)analyzed me/my viewpoint (i'm upset HN losing it's hip factor), misrepresented my proposal (censorship), then took your own analysis as a fact, and called me/my opinion "stupid" and "wrong" based on that.
of course, you didn't stop there, to add a bit of sarcasm and humor, you went on and checked the domain name that would remedy my non-existing problem. that's why i thanked you for proving my point.
this is a great example of low-quality hate content. it almost is a template, we can write a bot that exactly does what you do.
i'd normally not write back and pass, like many others, but just for this post's sake, i'm keeping this conversation on. also you said my links were pointless, let's put some other links here, quick glance at your comment history:
just to clarify, despite of low quality content you produce (to be fair, i also saw neutral ones) i'd never ban you, wouldn't try to suppress anything you want to say. i respect your viewpoint as much as you disrespect me and others.
i'd just like this system to put some measures so you express them respectfully. that's all.
these are as stupid as dotsies :) such that i'd love some of them get implemented to hackernews. "curmudgeon" badge would be very useful in fact. not to belittle people, but to encourage them. as long as we know that person has that tone of voice in general, nobody will judge the content by that. and the person will be free to express himself in anyway he/she sees fit.