It absolutely is. I don't really understand why people still confine themselves to a full IDE when doing "agentic programming".
Especially with neovim with something like fzf or ctrl-p, which lets just quickly navigate codebases. This is about as far as you need to go. So to me, being terminal-first and being able to do multiple things at once makes more sense (hence tmux).
There's quite a few jazz things that are missing. E.g., altered and bebop scales, 7#9 and 7b9 chords. Plus, for any given chord, there are a lot of voicings (drop 2, rootless, etc.).
This suite could be a really cool resource for new/intermediate jazz guitarists if you add some of the jazz stuff in. Any decent jazz guitar book could give you the most used scales and chord voicings.
Since the UX is already quite good, maybe if you open source it and if these things are easy to add, you could rely on the community to do so to some extent.
In my experience the connection is much easier to accidentally break through movement (e.g., walking) with a USB-C adapter than straight-through 3.5mm.
I really miss having a 3.5mm output on my phone...
You don't need every programmer to leverage the architecture for the market to accept it, just a few that hyper-optimize an implementation to a highly valuable problem (e.g., ads or something like that).
I was running i3 on Arch before. Then, I moved to Gnome Shell and have been daily driving COSMIC for a couple months. I think you will like it. At least on Alpha there were a couple rough edges here and there, but no deal breakers for me.
> > You have to be bad in order to discover what kind of good you want to be (or are able to be).
>
> Sounds like one of those pseudo-profound woo statements.
>
> Many people manage being perfect good, well-adjusted humans without going through a bout of "being bad".
The way I read it, that paragraph is not about whether anyone can be a well-adjusted human or not. Rather, it is about how specifically some people discover what kind of good they want to be by being bad.
In that sense, "you have to be bad" talks to those people specifically, and uses "have" to refer to that causal process.
(English is not my first language, so my interpretation may be very wrong.)
In that case they wouldn't be a viable alternative, would they. A train can go 500+ km/h, and with good planning they don't have to cost 10x, so you're premise does not stand.
It absolutely is. I don't really understand why people still confine themselves to a full IDE when doing "agentic programming".
Especially with neovim with something like fzf or ctrl-p, which lets just quickly navigate codebases. This is about as far as you need to go. So to me, being terminal-first and being able to do multiple things at once makes more sense (hence tmux).