Same here. The only problem is that I "only" have 24Gb of RAM. I wish I could upgrade but it's a hard limit. And keyboard quality seems to have been degrading over the years since 2020. Is this new model good in terms of keyboard?
Indeed I can't see the point of shipping the "AI first" feature as a whole editor. It seems to me that it should be a feature of any editor, or else I'd like to be convinced by arguments less marketing oriented than those I see on the home page.
This argument sounds to me like security through obscurity [1], the same way some people incriminate emergency evacuation maps of buildings when there is a shooting because they helped attackers find their way inside...
Worldwide shared knowledge versus protection against potential attacks.
> It happens more often than people think
This argument seems to be a strawman, what is the real probability of a wood thief to commit their business, and in particular with the help of that map?
Using the Svelte JS library (https://svelte.technology) you can have both: server-side rendered components [1] and compile to web components (custom elements) [2]
Another advantage is that the components compile to vanilla JavaScript, so we don't rely on a runtime library to run the application.
I prefer Scuttlebutt because of the P2P architecture which allows offline-first and no-backend. With Mastodon I still have to have an internet connection, and create an account on a server.
Despite the "damn" and "hell" words you use, let me develop my opinion.
It is not the user rights which allow them to do whatever they want.
I totally agree that one must not violate the terms expressed by the author.
I don't like to talk about "my" creation or "yours" or somebody's. Because every creator is inspired from previous ones. Someone obviously works for a certain amount of time, but the concept of paternity is strange given all the inspiration. When I write free software, I always consider it would not have been possible to do it without libraries and other inspiration. So it's normal to give back the product of my time to the world, which gave me the base to do it.
I create things not to do business, but to make the world match my ideas and hope people will follow and improve.
And I would really be pleased if somebody has a complaint or criticism, and takes the time to "fix" it concretely by coding it, not just expressing it.
In arts (music, painting, etc) this is natural, as in science and research. About computer science, how people can improve then if it's not free software? That would be a "use it or drop it" situation, not adapted for collective improvement.
So using free software licenses, as a creator, makes the world better. The contrary doesn't make the world worse, but freezes it until free software appears. That's waste of time in a sense!
That's why I don't recommend people to use proprietary software. Because it maintains the world in a situation which is not ideal, globally.
I understand people want to make money for a living. But there are economic models quite OK with free software. We have to find a way, I mean collectively, to finance free software. That would be an improvement for society,better than defending proprietary software.