Sam started off (even before the email exchange - and during it) misrepresenting Chomsky's ideas, even stating blunt untruths about Chomsky's words from a book he admitted to not even reading. How can anyone take such a slanderous clown seriously after that? If he wanted to have a serious discussion with a person he falsely slandered, he should have started with a sincere apology and then a very careful exposition of his worthless thought experiments and their purpose.