Yeah I can second this. I've been using native LSP since 0.5 nightly and it's been nothing but solid. The only thing that occasionally gave me issues were tree-sitter crashes (unrelated to LSP), but even those seem to have all been fixed by now.
Do you know of any good resources for tracking what real-world usage there is for smart contacts? Preferably something that details actual usage statistics rather than a list of companies that purport to do something with them.
TL;DR: PRs are not based off a diff between master and a remote branch. Instead, phabricator sends up patches to code review and when approved, the Phabricator tooling handles the rebase locally. No remote branches and clean history.
You're confusing the local observation time of a phenomena with the time the phenomena occurred as observed from our frame of reference and relative distance from its origin.
This is more for other readers as I'm sure you know this, but VFX / animation facilities are very different than other post-production functions like editing and sound, which almost always run on Macs. Final Cut and Logic are mostly the reasons for that (Blackmagic is making a real effort to change that though).
There's a trend amongst dynamic languages to slowly add type hints (see Mypy for Python, Typescript, etc) so I see these issues becoming less important over time.
I've been using Python on a daily basis for close to a decade now, I can probably count on my hand how many times a bug has been because of casting a string to an int.
Can someone more educated on the subject please explain to me what would be required to turn this into a proper development machine? I'm asking about what iOS changes would be needed, rather than opinions about the physical aspects of it like form factor.
I agree. Optimizing a developer library for developers who struggle to understand what a class is seems like a good way to build something very convoluted.
I would rephrase it as "the price is so much higher, suppliers are forced to develop alternative products to satisfy demand". Energy suppliers have been given massive subsidies for decades because they don't have to factor in the negative externalities. A carbon cost should be a part of the balance sheet in the way raw materials are. Given that, suppliers will have to innovate their way to bring price back down to equilibrium, or go out of business.
Even though your question has been deservedly downvoted, it still deserves an answer. Global warming implies that our effect on the planet is restricted to an upward trend in global temperature. Although that's the principal result of human emissions, the issue manifests itself in many other ways, including but limited to: sea level rise, extreme weather events, substantial changes and extinction of flora and fauna, loss of coral reefs, loss of ice sheets, etc.
Climate change includes the broad ecological changes that stem from a warming planet, rather than a narrow focus on the warming itself.