>because I agree with the Court that Congress never intended to grant the EPA that authority.
Luckily nothing stops Congress from making laws that clarify what they granted the EPA. If they were so fussed with the EPA doing what they were doing, why didn't they leap up and pass a law that told them to stop?
Why is it the court's job to tell congress what they meant to say? Is congress mute?
That's a two way street. It's not that China has Apple over a barrel. There is a MAD aspect to the relationship. Apple is definitely trying to get out of China as a manufacturing dependency. They'd rather not be banned from the market, but they are preparing for that. Let's rip the band-aid off, I say.
>China banning American services is to the detriment of Chinese users and competition in China, there's no reason to emulate censorship.
This is not true. China financializes everything, and pumps capital into projects at rates unseen and unmatched in the history of the world. There is plenty of competition, as evidenced by the fact that China has apps that are fare more efficient and feature rich than anything in the US. See: WeChat.
The interest rate was hike was baked into the price already. Now there's a re-shuffle where people with higher risk tolerances start buying up stocks that are on sale.
>Somewhere, off in the distance, a coal or gas-fired generator is producing a significant majority portion of that electric energy
For every car that is produced, two things are true:
(1) It takes fossil fuels to make and deliver them.
(2) It takes fossil fuels to run them.
For every internal combustion engine car produced in 2022, both (1) and (2) will true for the entire life of the vehicle, which in the US is around 12 years.
For every electric car, only (1) is guaranteed to be true for the life of the car. (2) is a choice, one that we can change in the 12 years that vehicle in on the road.
I don't know how anyone over the age of 30 could write this headline with the word "could." I know there's data behind it, and that we have to be careful not to assume things without the data but...
Have they been outside in the summer, in the midwest? In the mid-1990s you could nearly read a book by the light of lightning bugs. Now's nearly dark.
I noticed the text of your comment ins grey, which means someone downvoted you. I disagree on first take of your comment, because QA to me doesn't represent a lower-tier of anything. It's a tech job. Women being in tech is good. Indian people being in tech is good. Will you share a bit more about your thinking? Why do you see this as being discrimination?
Sidenote: I once glanced around a team I was working on a few years ago and found most of the product/program managers were gay or lesbian. Didn't strike me as discrimination, since there are, of course, gay and lesbian hardware engineers, gay and lesbian software engineers... it just happened that we all found each other on a particular team.
So that's why I think that's what's going on here, but I'm eager to hear your thoughts, as they differ from mine.
Article doesn't make it clear what the definition of paycheck-to-paycheck is, so I'm wondering if behind all this is that famous, infuriating "budget" of the $500k earner that still feels poor, somehow:
>Every time this guy tweets, I regret my purchase more and more.
You are certainly free to feel however you like about your own purchases, but I have to say, I don't understand it. Either you like the car or you don't. If you do -- great! Drive away. If you don't -- sell it. Don't see what the WFH policy of Tesla has to do with anything.
Tesla employees are adults. They are not trapped by poverty wages. They are professionals. They can leave if they don't like it.
I'm a die-hard WFH'er and also not a CEO. Musk should run his company how he feels best.
That the term 'Apple Tax' exists shows that there is a reputation hit and shows that consumers are price conscious in ways that do not take into account supply and demand as a sole or primary factor when determining their brand sentiment. That Apple is the most profitable in comparison to other companies says nothing about how profitable it could be if the negative brand perception didn't exist.
I don't see where this statistic controls for people who didn't graduate or for people who didn't take classes for which they would not be successful.
This average GPA could represent grade inflation. Or it could represent increased information symmetry between the difficulty of classes and the students themselves, paired with the students' interests, determination, and aptitude.
Yep. Even better, if they flood the market with additional units and sell them at the same price, it's the resellers (scalpers) take the hit, and not them. Sony is probably selling them at a loss and intending to make it up on the software (game) sales. This means doing anything to decrease the demand, even a little, reduces their ability to make money on the part of the business that is intended to make the money.
The supreme court has no enforcement mechanism. It has no army, no police. Abiding by Supreme Court rulings is by tradition only.
>Where ambiguity exists, it is the court's job to interpret the law. That's literally the entire purpose of a court.
This is also by tradition only. The Constitution doesn't specify this, nor are there any laws that say this is the job of the court.