Are Hacker News Job Postings Successful? What Is a “Rock Star Developer”?
Everyday I see Hacker News job postings, are they successful? Usually they are looking for the "Senior Rock Star Developers", or they are offering crazy benefits. I also notice some of the same companies reposting pretty often. Does that mean these companies are having trouble keeping people as employees, or they are just expanding that fast? I'm a pretty new developer, 1 1/2 years of professional experience at the same company. I have no plans of leaving my current company, but I just wonder what exactly a "Rock Star developer" is?
3 comments
Rock Star developer is a legend about a guy you hire.
He is the one that closes all the issues so fast you can't believe it, writes clean code, writes the documentation, and then refactors some ugly piece of code on the other end of your app/site into something beautiful.
Every team member understands his code, yet don't know how to implement it, especially in that short time. He does code reviews, writes tests, finds ways to make your site/stack/app/build process better, faster, cheaper, safer. And he does all of that 10x faster than other devs. So when he's out of work, he writes blog posts and conference talks and everyone claps and follows him on twitter and sends him linked-in requests and knows your company because he works there. In his free time, he contributes to open source, works on side projects and his github profile shows full green. You're probably using his libraries.
He's that creature of myth created by the internet that every PM wants to work with, every CTO wants on his team and every recruiter chases. The ever eluding white rabbit of development.
He is the one that closes all the issues so fast you can't believe it, writes clean code, writes the documentation, and then refactors some ugly piece of code on the other end of your app/site into something beautiful.
Every team member understands his code, yet don't know how to implement it, especially in that short time. He does code reviews, writes tests, finds ways to make your site/stack/app/build process better, faster, cheaper, safer. And he does all of that 10x faster than other devs. So when he's out of work, he writes blog posts and conference talks and everyone claps and follows him on twitter and sends him linked-in requests and knows your company because he works there. In his free time, he contributes to open source, works on side projects and his github profile shows full green. You're probably using his libraries.
He's that creature of myth created by the internet that every PM wants to work with, every CTO wants on his team and every recruiter chases. The ever eluding white rabbit of development.
This was so well written
Coincidentally, right now there isn't a single post asking for rock stars on the jobs page. They are like "X Is Hiring Ruby Developers".
1. White Male.
2. Preferrably went to some elite college.
3. Previous founder or has a passion for startups
4. Is popular on sites like github with 100+ followers
that's the standard, don't expect a reply unless you fit all of these things.
2. Preferrably went to some elite college.
3. Previous founder or has a passion for startups
4. Is popular on sites like github with 100+ followers
that's the standard, don't expect a reply unless you fit all of these things.
I've found two jobs in the Who's hiring thread twice, both of them remote! And I'm not even in the US. Out of your list, I only meet the "White Male" criterion.
I always thought a Rock Star Developer was a developer who plays in a rock band during his free time. I never got why employers were so adamant in hiring them.
I'm assuming you have no data to support your assumptions?