iRobot Announces Create 2: An Updated, Hackable Roomba(spectrum.ieee.org)
spectrum.ieee.org
iRobot Announces Create 2: An Updated, Hackable Roomba
http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/diy/irobot-announces-create-2-an-updated-hackable-roomba#.VIhxkpKzS9U.hackernews
28 comments
Looks like they've signed up for the R-Pi revolution instead.
http://www.irobot.com/~/media/MainSite/PDFs/About/STEM/Creat...
Makes me happy, since I'm a card carrying R-Pi nut.
http://www.irobot.com/~/media/MainSite/PDFs/About/STEM/Creat...
Makes me happy, since I'm a card carrying R-Pi nut.
Yeah, I'd prefer something like Pi as well. Rather than using my phone (which I would like to keep free for typical phone stuff) or buying a second device (can be awfully pricey), a RPi would be more flexible and potentially more affordable for students and tinkerers.
I'm sure plenty of us have an older smartphone around for projects and experiments but I think that just as many people sell or trade theirs in for a discount. That doesn't even take into consideration the issue with the variety of devices and types of docks out there. Something like a Pi is meant to be hacked and modded to fit into different use cases and you aren't automatically paying (both in terms of money and performance) for all of the overhead of general smartphone hardware and software.
I'm sure plenty of us have an older smartphone around for projects and experiments but I think that just as many people sell or trade theirs in for a discount. That doesn't even take into consideration the issue with the variety of devices and types of docks out there. Something like a Pi is meant to be hacked and modded to fit into different use cases and you aren't automatically paying (both in terms of money and performance) for all of the overhead of general smartphone hardware and software.
I have 8 old iphones in my house.
There are literally billions of old smartphones waiting for a good use.
There are literally billions of old smartphones waiting for a good use.
If I'm reading it correctly, the Create series does not have the vacuum components.
I used to be a big fan of iRobot, but after going through 4 of their robots, I have soured on them. Their batteries would die right after the warranty period ended. Plastic parts broke off from regular use. Each of them ended in the recycling bin after 1.5 - 2 years of use.
I used to be a big fan of iRobot, but after going through 4 of their robots, I have soured on them. Their batteries would die right after the warranty period ended. Plastic parts broke off from regular use. Each of them ended in the recycling bin after 1.5 - 2 years of use.
I had similar issues, but opted to go the route of replacing the battery rather than the whole Roomba. It's worked well for me.
In addition, Amazon reviews point to some third-party batteries that supposedly last even longer than iRobot ones.
In addition, Amazon reviews point to some third-party batteries that supposedly last even longer than iRobot ones.
Same here, I just replaced the battery with a cheaper third-party battery when the original ran out and get about 45-60 minutes of runtime out of it still after 2 years.
Yeah. I too have a meter high, cylindrical Roomba graveyard.
I bought the original Create when it came out in 2007. It was an awesome piece of tech back then, very stable/rugged, reasonable low level API, extendable, and yes "hackable".
The only downsides was the interface felt old even for 2007, which was a serial port (you'd see a lot of Create projects driving around with a laptop sitting on top of it). And the "battery pack" was useless and ran on I think 12 AA batteries which lasted about 10 minutes.
I got the bluetooth upgrade, which was $50 and the rechargeable battery pack and charge station which was probably another $100.
It's awesome to see the Create 2 includes a rechargeable battery pack AND charge station. It references Arduino and Raspberry Pi but there doesn't seem to be any special integration.
Can anyone find the exact sensors included? Same as the original Create?
The only downsides was the interface felt old even for 2007, which was a serial port (you'd see a lot of Create projects driving around with a laptop sitting on top of it). And the "battery pack" was useless and ran on I think 12 AA batteries which lasted about 10 minutes.
I got the bluetooth upgrade, which was $50 and the rechargeable battery pack and charge station which was probably another $100.
It's awesome to see the Create 2 includes a rechargeable battery pack AND charge station. It references Arduino and Raspberry Pi but there doesn't seem to be any special integration.
Can anyone find the exact sensors included? Same as the original Create?
I can't find a simple list of the sensors. But reading through this:
http://www.irobot.com/~/media/MainSite/PDFs/About/STEM/Creat...
And based on the fact the Create 2 is based on the 600 series I checked the wikipedia entry and figure the list will be:
http://www.irobot.com/~/media/MainSite/PDFs/About/STEM/Creat...
And based on the fact the Create 2 is based on the 600 series I checked the wikipedia entry and figure the list will be:
* Bump sensors (left and right)
* Wheel drop sensors (left and right)
* Four infrared "cliff sensors"
* Acoustic-based dirt sensors
* Optical sensor located in front of the vacuum bin
* Virtual Wall Lighthouse sensorVery cool, I bet I could get my younger kids interested in programming if we could chase the cats around :-)
Reminded me of the bigtrak http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Trak
You can do the same with Lego mindstorms.
This is an excellent opportunity to create a DJ roomba.
The original ROS turtle bot used the first Create. When Willow Garage refreshed it a couple years ago and a korean company redesigned the Create. http://kobuki.yujinrobot.com/home-en/about/specifications/
I wonder how this second gen Create compares to the Kobuki base.
I wonder how this second gen Create compares to the Kobuki base.
Sorry, if it doesn't have LIDAR, I don't want it.
An onboard LIDAR would make it quite a bit more expensive. I think if I were to play with one of these I would find a friend with an unused Kinect and use that for the sensing.
What do you think about the Neato? Many robot hobbyists will buy one just to get its scanning range finder and it's in the same price range as a roomba.
Now that would be more interesting. The Roomba is sense-deprived for a robot. It doesn't know where it is, and navigates by bumping into stuff. That's kind of lame. Hobbyists had those in the 1980s. Grey Walters' "turtles" did that in the late 1940s. Computing has made some progress since then.
By now, a hobbyist robot should have at least 2D SLAM, able to map its surroundings and navigate using the map.
By now, a hobbyist robot should have at least 2D SLAM, able to map its surroundings and navigate using the map.
Clicking the buy now link is taking me to the NL site. anyone else seeing this?
Does this link work for you?
http://store.irobot.com/irobot-create-2-programmable-robot/p...
http://store.irobot.com/irobot-create-2-programmable-robot/p...
Nope. Gets redirected to irobot.nl
I looked into it a bit and it states the following:
> At this time, we are able to ship within the United States and Canada only.
Might be the reason for the redirect?
> At this time, we are able to ship within the United States and Canada only.
Might be the reason for the redirect?
I'm really excited to see this come back! I'm a bit surprised they haven't taken advantage of the smart phone revolution since 2007. There should be a dock for your phone. The basics would involve beaming back sensor data and sending movement comments. The phone would also come with a camera.
Basically I'm wondering why they didn't build a better Romo http://www.romotive.com/