Understanding how killall works using strace(jvns.ca)
jvns.ca
Understanding how killall works using strace
http://jvns.ca/blog/2013/12/22/fun-with-strace/
14 comments
Very bad incompatibility between oses indeed. It hurts when you learn but you can never ever forget. I feel for you.
Actually I did not learned the hard way. But I was about to..
Actually I did not learned the hard way. But I was about to..
Never done this myself, but have done worse really. I was working at Sun a long time ago and we had a big shared development server. Being familiar with linux killall I suggested to my boss that he use killall instead of killing processes one by one. So he tried it out. Whole team had to wait quite a while for the server to restart. :-)
Random trivial apropos killall: The killall utility in FreeBSD had one of my all-time "favourite" bugs, prompting me to write this commit message in 2004:
Serial murderers shouldn't commit suicide. (killall should
avoid killing itself.)[deleted]
I learned that on UNIX System V machines such as Solaris, killall ignores parameters and just tries to kill everything [1]. Maybe it's better to use pkill on GNU/Linux instead.
1: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-5166/killall-1m/inde...
1: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-5166/killall-1m/inde...
Yep pkill is recommended on UNIX based OSs like Openindiana/Solaris etc. On these killall will actually do what it's name says :)
What's the use case of that?
It survives in Linux as killall5 (the 5 being a reference to System V Unix). It's used during shutdown to send SIGTERM to all processes, then SIGKILL to kill off any stragglers.
Cleaning up after a user's process that has something that's effectively a fork-bombing.
Also, terminating an employee.
Also, terminating an employee.
I think this article is great for learning about strace but it's not a good advice on learning about open source software.
Why not to look into the source?
I used strace for different scenarios and always it saved the day. But this would not be my play for learning about killall.
Why not to look into the source?
I used strace for different scenarios and always it saved the day. But this would not be my play for learning about killall.
Strace gives you a quick, higher level view of what is actually happening, which is sometimes much more useful than slogging through the source code of something.
You could use strace or ... you could just look at the code: http://src.gnu-darwin.org/src/usr.bin/killall/killall.c.html
Step 1: find the correct source code.
Reading code has its place and tracing code has its place. I have difficulty understanding nontrivial codebases without some amount of tracing. In this case you chose to present the source for a FreeBSD/OS X version of killall when OP is running Linux.
Reading code has its place and tracing code has its place. I have difficulty understanding nontrivial codebases without some amount of tracing. In this case you chose to present the source for a FreeBSD/OS X version of killall when OP is running Linux.
On my Linux system it's provided by psmisc:
http://sourceforge.net/p/psmisc/code/ci/master/tree/src/kill...
http://sourceforge.net/p/psmisc/code/ci/master/tree/src/kill...
Finding the right source for killall for whatever platform you want is trivial.
You didn't.
Great article! There's a slight typo--"stdout" should be "stderr", as 2 is the file descriptor instead of 1.
ltrace is also pretty neat; it shows library calls (as opposed to system calls) - so you should be able to see the missing "strcmp()"s alluded to in the article.
A bit offtopic:
Julia Evans finished Hacker School, so I wonder if she continues with her Rust based operating system?
https://github.com/jvns/puddle
featured on HN 3 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6935763
Julia Evans finished Hacker School, so I wonder if she continues with her Rust based operating system?
https://github.com/jvns/puddle
featured on HN 3 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6935763
What are the anonymous 4096 byte allocations before every read? I would think that killall would read /proc/{pid}/stat directly into a stack buffer, especially if the reads are only 1024 bytes.
I had a quick look. There are 6 calls to malloc in the killall program and several calls to functions like asprintf which will allocate. See my other post for source.
Anyone know of a good strace tutorial or how-to to start getting the best out of it?
I made a screencast showing a practical example of how to use strace to debug PHP/Apache issues.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF-p--AH37E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF-p--AH37E
I get the best out of it by knowing about its -f option, and the fact that the program htop is like top but crazier, and there you can press "s" to jump to a paged strace view of any process you can control.
strace is a pretty neat tool. You might also be interested in the Windows NT equivalent: http://www.intellectualheaven.com/default.asp?BH=projects&H=...
The supported Windows equivalent is actually Event Tracing for Windows (ETW): http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb96...
strace is one of my favourite tools. I don't need it that often, but it's comforting to know that it's there. Documentation can lie or just not answer my question, the source code might be unavailable or unreadable, but if I have a question that strace can answer, I can rely on it to answer.
It's one of the things I miss on OS X. dtruss isn't as powerful, and dtrace seems like it might be more powerful but I have no idea how to use it.
It's one of the things I miss on OS X. dtruss isn't as powerful, and dtrace seems like it might be more powerful but I have no idea how to use it.
ltrace never seems to get as much attention as strace:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ltrace
> ltrace is a debugging utility in Linux, used to display the calls a userland application makes to shared libraries.
This is useful because strace can completely ignore the information you really want. OTOH, ltrace doesn't provide information that's as pretty as what strace shows, because ltrace doesn't know as much about the functions it's showing you. This means arguments passed as pointers will be shown as pointer values, functions will occasionally be shown as taking the wrong number of arguments, and enum values will be shown as ints.
ltrace also can't show function calls to functions in statically-linked libraries, because it hooks into the dynamic loading mechanism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ltrace
> ltrace is a debugging utility in Linux, used to display the calls a userland application makes to shared libraries.
This is useful because strace can completely ignore the information you really want. OTOH, ltrace doesn't provide information that's as pretty as what strace shows, because ltrace doesn't know as much about the functions it's showing you. This means arguments passed as pointers will be shown as pointer values, functions will occasionally be shown as taking the wrong number of arguments, and enum values will be shown as ints.
ltrace also can't show function calls to functions in statically-linked libraries, because it hooks into the dynamic loading mechanism.
I almost think this is one of those "rights of passage" -- that everybody must do this at least once. You'll learn it the hard way but then you'll never forget...
Kinda like many years ago when I was (new to Cisco gear and) making changes to a firewall ruleset -- remotely -- and decided to take a shortcut because I was supposed to go meet friends and so I was in a hurry.