John Carmack Quakecon 2013 Keynote Livestream(twitch.tv)
twitch.tv
John Carmack Quakecon 2013 Keynote Livestream
http://www.twitch.tv/bethesda
48 comments
"Kinect is sort of like a zero-button mouse with a lot of latency on it."
John Carmack talks at length about Haskell in this keynote. Definitely worth watching if you're interested in that stuff.
He seems to start talking about Haskell at 1 hour and 32 minutes into the VOD of the talk [1] (don't think he mentioned it before that).
[1] http://www.twitch.tv/bethesda/b/439369577?t=1h32m
[1] http://www.twitch.tv/bethesda/b/439369577?t=1h32m
He also talks about Lisp and functional programming in general.
He talks at length about the recent years of Armadillo, I think it is really interesting his gripe was a lack of oversight from his end when he wasn't active on site, while he was spending a million a year funding the project. I wonder how many of the startups around these parts could use that kind of lesson (ie, inverse of the overbearing boss).
I also love that John Carmack and Elon Musk are email buddies, and that even John Carmack isn't thinking big enough for Elon =P
I also love that John Carmack and Elon Musk are email buddies, and that even John Carmack isn't thinking big enough for Elon =P
John Carmack isn't thinking big enough for Elon
A few years ago I had the same thought about Carmack. I wondered why he seemingly abandoned his vision for space travel by returning to work in the game industry on Rage. I figured Carmack probably realized that Elon's SpaceX was going to "win the race" and gave up. Or maybe Carmack is just getting old. Either way, he's still one of my heroes.
A few years ago I had the same thought about Carmack. I wondered why he seemingly abandoned his vision for space travel by returning to work in the game industry on Rage. I figured Carmack probably realized that Elon's SpaceX was going to "win the race" and gave up. Or maybe Carmack is just getting old. Either way, he's still one of my heroes.
John is less than one year older than Elon. They are both hugely smart from a technology standpoint but John's knowledge goes very deep. John's focus is implementing the future of technology personally. Elon's focus is bringing sufficient capital to bring the technological future to the present.
Both came from game dev backgrounds. Carmack announced he was getting into rockets a couple of years before Musk sold paypay... and then got into rockets :)
I wouldn't be surprised if Carmack heavily inspired Musk. If not just with shareware, and online payments, then with rockets.
Also, the public .plan files he published in the 90s heavily inspired the web log/blog craze :)
I wouldn't be surprised if Carmack heavily inspired Musk. If not just with shareware, and online payments, then with rockets.
Also, the public .plan files he published in the 90s heavily inspired the web log/blog craze :)
These are interesting points. I think the crowd that wasn't on the web in the mid 90's may not understand just how influential Carmack was on so many of us.
Armadillo vs. SpaceX just seem like completely different scales of project. Like Armadillo had the kind of problems that hobbyists have, like they couldn't get a good enough quality of hydrogen peroxide, and they had problems sourcing tanks and such. SpaceX just throws money and people at those kind of problems.
Honestly I think it really is as simple as what he answered in this talk: he doesn't want to risk the money.
Elon on the other hand, has been willing to double down on bets involving 100's of millions of dollars or more. That speaks to a very different view of risk/reward between them (and not one I think is negative to either side).
Also, while Carmack is certainly enormously respected in his field, he hasn't worked much outside that. Elon's track record has diverse successes, and I think that means it's a lot easier for Elon to convince investors to join his endeavors.
Elon on the other hand, has been willing to double down on bets involving 100's of millions of dollars or more. That speaks to a very different view of risk/reward between them (and not one I think is negative to either side).
Also, while Carmack is certainly enormously respected in his field, he hasn't worked much outside that. Elon's track record has diverse successes, and I think that means it's a lot easier for Elon to convince investors to join his endeavors.
I skimmed the talk and found the clip on Armadillo Aerospace.
It's slightly more than 10 minutes: http://www.twitch.tv/bethesda/b/439369577?t=2h04m56s
It's slightly more than 10 minutes: http://www.twitch.tv/bethesda/b/439369577?t=2h04m56s
You could also watch Carmack's keynote from YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNWAcEu1jpU
Thanks! Just to note, Carmack doesn't come out until 15 minutes into that video.
I really enjoy that Carmack speaks so precisely. It makes it a joy to listen to anything he has to say. He truly is a brilliant guy.
I would say I want him to make a podcast (and would pay like $5 a month for an episode), but considering he thinks hes wasting his free time if all hes doing is learning scheme and implementing Wolfenstein in Haskell, I definitely don't want to take away of his time to educate muggles.
Right, but if it made enough money to fund Armadillo it might be worth his time.
This is a good point, why doesn't he crowdfund Armadillo?
Link to the video to watch later: http://www.twitch.tv/bethesda/b/439369577
His talks are unstructured brain dumps that take a lot of effort to unpack. Even so, they contain interesting experience/research/experimentation insights that make it worth the effort. I have every single keynote right from 1998 and its interesting to see how his thoughts have shaped over the years.
For people new to game dev don't miss these ..
Tim Sweeney's talk at POPL about the next mainstream programming language.
http://www.st.cs.uni-saarland.de/edu/seminare/2005/advanced-...
and Jonathan Blow's column from gdmag.
http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=971590
For people new to game dev don't miss these ..
Tim Sweeney's talk at POPL about the next mainstream programming language.
http://www.st.cs.uni-saarland.de/edu/seminare/2005/advanced-...
and Jonathan Blow's column from gdmag.
http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=971590
Was just discussing Tim Sweeney on reddit when someone told me that he was publishing papers on dependently typed languages (found a public one in pdf) http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/1jj40p/john_carmack...
Always a pleasure to see John wax lyrical on graphics tech. I used to love reading his .plan files back in the day and recently found a link to a PDF version of some of them here on HN: http://www.scribd.com/doc/14192/John-Carmack-Archive-plan-19... - via https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3367230
That is not a link to a PDF. Would you mind sharing the original PDF if you have it? I can't/won't read scribd documents.
Edit: As an HTML document: http://www.team5150.com/~andrew/carmack/plan.html
Edit: As an HTML document: http://www.team5150.com/~andrew/carmack/plan.html
FWIW, here's a link to a PDF version:
http://fd.fabiensanglard.net/doom3/pdfs/johnc-plan_1997.pdf
http://fd.fabiensanglard.net/doom3/pdfs/johnc-plan_1997.pdf
It is at http://floodyberry.com/carmack/ now, although I desperately need to update it.
Your link doesn't work.
Do you mean "can't" as in "I've blocked it for myself" i.e. "won't"? :)
Do you mean "can't" as in "I've blocked it for myself" i.e. "won't"? :)
oh good question, I always assumed you could just download the pdf version from scribd. but you need to pay $9 for that. Who the hell gets the money? and who would ever use it ever.
I fondly remember fingering John about once a week back when I was in university just to see if he had posted anything new.
He is really into Haskell. Would love to see some practical example from him.
ps:he can speak for hours.
ps:he can speak for hours.
This is probably not as fun as the stuff Carmack is up to, but if anyone out there wants to see some examples of "real" stuff done in Haskell (for "typical startup" values of "real"), check out Real World Haskell. I found it to be a great read, especially after working through Learn You a Haskell.
http://book.realworldhaskell.org/read/
http://book.realworldhaskell.org/read/
He tweets about his experiments in various languages quite a bit if you don't already follow him there.
https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack
https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack
Is anyone doing anything related to a universal memory abstraction in the Linux kernel? He speaks for around 5 minutes at the 20 minute mark about a unified memory architecture, and I just say hell yes. I think it might become one of the largest problems in the apu / dedicated card world, and just in general it is always an issue in a transition from dedicated plug in hardware cards with their own memories to integrated solutions using system memory. Having real universal reference would make all that a non problem.
He actually started talking about unified memory architecture at about the 51 minute mark. (If anyone else is curious.)
I meant after he started talking, my bad. I was watching it live. In the vod that might not make sense.
Oops! No, that's my bad. I liked your comment by the way. I was just trying to give people a reference time if they were curious.
I'm still watching the VOD because I didn't catch it live. I didn't realize the timing doesn't sync. In the VOD he first talks about unified memory architecture at about 51 minutes.
I'm still watching the VOD because I didn't catch it live. I didn't realize the timing doesn't sync. In the VOD he first talks about unified memory architecture at about 51 minutes.
His keynotes are always so good. I'm really looking forward to watching it a bit later.
This year's speech made me think what it might have been like to listen to visionaries in the past give a talk out in the middle of a town's square.
It was like the room was dead silent (not even random people coughing or opening bags of snacks) for 3 hours while one of the smartest game devs talked about various topics.
It was like the room was dead silent (not even random people coughing or opening bags of snacks) for 3 hours while one of the smartest game devs talked about various topics.
Is it possible to get a permalink to the talk so that I can watch it later? (or will this link work for that?)
http://www.twitch.tv/bethesda/b/439369577?t=15m
This is the automatic twitch vod they were mentioning, with the timestamp. By the way, Carmack has been going at it for more than 2 and a half hours now. Impressive!
This is the automatic twitch vod they were mentioning, with the timestamp. By the way, Carmack has been going at it for more than 2 and a half hours now. Impressive!
How impressive? He is impressive and just talking about what he does and loves is easy :)!
it was more impressive last year, when he was talking for 3.5 hours while the most of the group stage games of quakelive tournament was played. there was only one quakecon stream allowed, so those games had to be democasted later.
i had a very mixed feelings: on one hand, listening carmack is very interesting, on another - i am a quake fan and wanted to see great games.
this year they have a separate stream for games, and it is great btw. absolutely top notch work from the faceit team: http://www.twitch.tv/quakecon
i had a very mixed feelings: on one hand, listening carmack is very interesting, on another - i am a quake fan and wanted to see great games.
this year they have a separate stream for games, and it is great btw. absolutely top notch work from the faceit team: http://www.twitch.tv/quakecon
Yeah, Twitch automatically provides VODs when the Livestream is finnished.
Could someone post timecoded highlights? I probably can't watch a 3h keynote as I'm not a gamer, but I'd like to watch the bits I'm interested in (like about rockets, Haskell etc).
It's an extremely monolog, and he tends to follow connections in his thinking between the various topic areas, so it's difficult to index.
And honestly, I'd say only 20% of the talk is directly about gaming. Most of it is about what he thinks the future will be like in terms of programming and hardware.
And honestly, I'd say only 20% of the talk is directly about gaming. Most of it is about what he thinks the future will be like in terms of programming and hardware.
PsiAmp on Reddit [1] linked to a YouTube playlist which does that.
[1] http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1jj4y0/john_car...
[1] http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1jj4y0/john_car...
if you are interested in rendering, don't miss out John's talk at 5pm dallas time today: "Principles of Lightining and Rendering with John Carmack"
http://www.quakecon.org/event-schedule/
Should also be streamed on the quakecon twitch stream.
according to the keynet video, it is supposed to be a talk he has given internally at id before and was urged to redo it at quakecon.
"John will present a lecture-style presentation on the physics of light transport and rendering. He will discuss how light behaves in the real world, and the approximations and compromises that are involved in simulating the behavior with computers. Note: not for the technically faint at heart."
"John will present a lecture-style presentation on the physics of light transport and rendering. He will discuss how light behaves in the real world, and the approximations and compromises that are involved in simulating the behavior with computers. Note: not for the technically faint at heart."
Lots of big hints there for developers to pick up on. Haskell for a large simulation project , GPGPU advancement, 120 hz clock with physics interpolation, benefits of functions without side effects, performance benefits from elegant design rather than complicated optimization kludges.