Ask HN: Would someone in Australia mind pinging 3 IP addresses for me?
6 comments
Brisbane, iiNet, Australia
PING 202.146.213.3 (202.146.213.3) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 202.146.213.3: icmp_req=1 ttl=56 time=497 ms
64 bytes from 202.146.213.3: icmp_req=2 ttl=56 time=548 ms
64 bytes from 202.146.213.3: icmp_req=3 ttl=56 time=572 ms
64 bytes from 202.146.213.3: icmp_req=4 ttl=56 time=590 ms
64 bytes from 202.146.213.3: icmp_req=5 ttl=56 time=674 ms
64 bytes from 202.146.213.3: icmp_req=6 ttl=56 time=401 ms
64 bytes from 202.146.213.3: icmp_req=7 ttl=56 time=409 ms
64 bytes from 202.146.213.3: icmp_req=8 ttl=56 time=446 ms
--- 202.146.213.3 ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7001ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 401.078/517.690/674.353/89.851 ms
PING 106.187.98.41 (106.187.98.41) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=1 ttl=48 time=245 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=2 ttl=48 time=282 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=3 ttl=48 time=300 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=4 ttl=48 time=157 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=5 ttl=48 time=309 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=6 ttl=48 time=264 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=7 ttl=48 time=266 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=8 ttl=48 time=253 ms
--- 106.187.98.41 ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7001ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 157.676/259.900/309.386/43.775 ms
PING 50.116.56.20 (50.116.56.20) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=1 ttl=50 time=477 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=2 ttl=50 time=321 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=3 ttl=50 time=253 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=4 ttl=50 time=390 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=5 ttl=50 time=328 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=6 ttl=50 time=254 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=7 ttl=50 time=277 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=8 ttl=50 time=277 ms
--- 50.116.56.20 ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7006ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 253.785/322.739/477.706/72.651 ms
--- 202.146.213.3 ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7001ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 401.078/517.690/674.353/89.851 ms
PING 106.187.98.41 (106.187.98.41) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=1 ttl=48 time=245 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=2 ttl=48 time=282 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=3 ttl=48 time=300 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=4 ttl=48 time=157 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=5 ttl=48 time=309 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=6 ttl=48 time=264 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=7 ttl=48 time=266 ms 64 bytes from 106.187.98.41: icmp_req=8 ttl=48 time=253 ms
--- 106.187.98.41 ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7001ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 157.676/259.900/309.386/43.775 ms
PING 50.116.56.20 (50.116.56.20) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=1 ttl=50 time=477 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=2 ttl=50 time=321 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=3 ttl=50 time=253 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=4 ttl=50 time=390 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=5 ttl=50 time=328 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=6 ttl=50 time=254 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=7 ttl=50 time=277 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.56.20: icmp_req=8 ttl=50 time=277 ms
--- 50.116.56.20 ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7006ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 253.785/322.739/477.706/72.651 ms
Hi,
Sydney, Dodo, Australia:
202.146.213.23
Pinging 202.146.213.3 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 202.146.213.3: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.146.213.3: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.146.213.3: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.146.213.3: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=58
106.187.98.41
Pinging 106.187.98.41 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 106.187.98.41: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=51
Reply from 106.187.98.41: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=51
Reply from 106.187.98.41: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=51
Reply from 106.187.98.41: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=51
50.116.56.20
Pinging 50.116.56.20 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 50.116.56.20: bytes=32 time=243ms TTL=45
Reply from 50.116.56.20: bytes=32 time=243ms TTL=45
Reply from 50.116.56.20: bytes=32 time=242ms TTL=45
Reply from 50.116.56.20: bytes=32 time=242ms TTL=45
Hope this helps
D
Sydney, Dodo, Australia:
202.146.213.23
Pinging 202.146.213.3 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 202.146.213.3: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.146.213.3: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.146.213.3: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.146.213.3: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=58
106.187.98.41
Pinging 106.187.98.41 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 106.187.98.41: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=51
Reply from 106.187.98.41: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=51
Reply from 106.187.98.41: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=51
Reply from 106.187.98.41: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=51
50.116.56.20
Pinging 50.116.56.20 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 50.116.56.20: bytes=32 time=243ms TTL=45
Reply from 50.116.56.20: bytes=32 time=243ms TTL=45
Reply from 50.116.56.20: bytes=32 time=242ms TTL=45
Reply from 50.116.56.20: bytes=32 time=242ms TTL=45
Hope this helps
D
Melbourne, Australia, on the Telstra Bigpond network
--- 202.146.213.3 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19028ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.950/25.286/51.303/8.962 ms
PING 106.187.98.41 (106.187.98.41) 56(84) bytes of data.
--- 106.187.98.41 ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19027ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 137.024/140.286/151.213/3.711 ms PING 50.116.56.20 (50.116.56.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
--- 50.116.56.20 ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19005ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 232.608/235.623/249.223/4.021 ms
--- 106.187.98.41 ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19027ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 137.024/140.286/151.213/3.711 ms PING 50.116.56.20 (50.116.56.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
--- 50.116.56.20 ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19005ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 232.608/235.623/249.223/4.021 ms
Just in case, one more.
Melbourne - Internode.
--- 202.146.213.3 ping statistics --- 15 packets transmitted, 15 received, 0% packet loss, time 14025ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.684/147.028/1011.345/270.898 ms, pipe 2
--- 106.187.98.41 ping statistics --- 12 packets transmitted, 12 received, 0% packet loss, time 11003ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 139.057/202.351/863.312/199.302 ms
--- 50.116.56.20 ping statistics --- 17 packets transmitted, 16 received, 5% packet loss, time 16027ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 254.239/419.566/1011.784/285.667 ms, pipe 2
Melbourne - Internode.
--- 202.146.213.3 ping statistics --- 15 packets transmitted, 15 received, 0% packet loss, time 14025ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.684/147.028/1011.345/270.898 ms, pipe 2
--- 106.187.98.41 ping statistics --- 12 packets transmitted, 12 received, 0% packet loss, time 11003ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 139.057/202.351/863.312/199.302 ms
--- 50.116.56.20 ping statistics --- 17 packets transmitted, 16 received, 5% packet loss, time 16027ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 254.239/419.566/1011.784/285.667 ms, pipe 2
I'm in Perth, Western Australia (my ISP is iiNet):
202.146.213.3 - 65ms
106.187.98.41 - 169ms
50.116.56.20 - 286ms
202.146.213.3 - 65ms
106.187.98.41 - 169ms
50.116.56.20 - 286ms
Thanks very much both of you!
Would someone who is in Australia mind pinging these 3 IP addresses of the hosts I'm considering and telling me the average ping time?
Quadra Hosting 202.146.213.3
WPEngine Tokyo 106.187.98.41
WPEngine US 50.116.56.20
If you could also tell me where in Australia you are that would be great!
Thanks!