Canning Spam: Why is it so difficult to prevent junk e-mail?(economist.com)

3 pointsby dpapathanasiou19년 전4 comments

Canning Spam: Why is it so difficult to prevent junk e-mail?

http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9805795

4 comments

chmike19년 전

I see at least two problems at the source of junk e-mail. 1X no authentication of sender. One of the most problematic consequence is that reporting errors to senders had to be disabled. smtp protocol, in its most common usage form, is broken. Relying on DNS to authenticate (DKIM) is just moving the problem to depend on DNS which is also weak from the security perspective.

2X the need for one to be contactable by anybody. This requires to open a door for incoming info which will be exploited by spammers. This is an old problem that managers are facing for years. The role of spam filter was hold by the secretary (human filtering phone calls, visits).

The problem 1 is a technical problem and it is a shame it has not been solved yet. Problem 2 is the real root of spamming. There are various ways to address problem 2. This is one of the business model I'm currently investigating.

bharath19년 전

There are 2 cases to look at: 1) Personal email IDs: Most people used some form of web-based email. For those of us that use Gmail for example, I dont know if spam is that big of a problem anymore. Some spam (at least for me) makes its way through the gmail filters -- but its at a level where I can live with it. I would imagine that Google's recent Postini acquisition will end up making the Gmail anti-spam solution better. 2) So that leaves us with enterprises. The solutions proposed in the article will not work for enterprises. DKIM for example, will not work in the botnet case. CAPTCHA based solutions have usability constraints -- they cannot be mandated upon customers and others who frequently mail people within the organization. So most enterprises are forced to rely on gateway based antispam solution thats basically a cat and mouse game.

Tichy19년 전

Both suggestions fail, because spam is usually sent from hijacked computers. Nothing to prevent the hijacker from hijacking the "credit card" and the authentication, too.

Also, I don't think it is true that the "undeliverable" type of spam had it's origin on the recipients computer. Spammers just put the email address into the sender field, it doesn't imply a compromised PC.

cstejerean19년 전

It's difficult to prevent spam because there is plenty of money to be made from spam and as long as there is lots of money to be made the spammers will get VERY creative.