Lenticular.js - tilt-controlled images(lenticular.attasi.com)
lenticular.attasi.com
Lenticular.js - tilt-controlled images
http://lenticular.attasi.com/#
20 comments
Works fine on desktop Chrome for me.
Works fine on Chrome stable on my desktop, and on Chrome on my Galaxy SII. Haven't tested other browsers.
It works great here on both ubuntu (xps 13 laptop) and android (Jelly Bean) with the latest chrome.
Still. iPhone (only) tailored web-development has taken the web back into the "this site was designed for MSIE" abyss.
Guessing if things posted on HN will work in browsers and OSes I use (non provided by Apple, for highly ethical reasons) is a daily game of chance.
Is that really what we want? Is that the future we want? Wasn't this what we all shunned Microsoft for doing?
Guessing if things posted on HN will work in browsers and OSes I use (non provided by Apple, for highly ethical reasons) is a daily game of chance.
Is that really what we want? Is that the future we want? Wasn't this what we all shunned Microsoft for doing?
The difference is that when people build on cutting edge tech that just about everyone agrees will be standard eventually they help push the advancement of that technology, when people built for IE only they used tech just about everyone agreed was horrible, caused vendor lock-in and was a huge security risk. I think if it works on Chrome, Firefox, IE 10, Windows, Linux, Mac, iOS and Android, we're pretty clear of vendor lock-in.
working on Fennec (firefox mobile) nightly
As much as I personally enjoy the demo the creator chose for the main page, I wonder whether said creator could have found a "flo-mo" view of something captivating for reasons other than "this chick is hot". (There's a really unpleasant history of the male gaze being squeezed into tech demos -- I don't think we need to do that anymore.)
On the contrary, it makes perfect sense given the target audience. I don't have a problem with hunky males appearing on the covers of romance novels.
I think you're trying to say something like "as long as developers are primarily men, marketing to developers means marketing to men". I see logic in that. But what you're leaving out is that the lack of women in tech fields is a serious problem, and it's a problem that is reinforced every time you do something that assumes a developer must be a man. So, whether or not this kind of demo is effective, I think it's destructive and irresponsible, in a small way.
(Besides, I find sex in advertising to be distasteful and kind of insulting. I expect it on TV, but I'd hope that the small community we have here would be a bit less base.)
(Besides, I find sex in advertising to be distasteful and kind of insulting. I expect it on TV, but I'd hope that the small community we have here would be a bit less base.)
Guess I'm not the target audience?
Hey guys, thanks for checking this out. It was a really fun project to build! There are plenty of bugs to fix and devices to test. If you'd like to help, shoot me a pull request: https://github.com/thomasxiii/lenticular.js.
Doesn't work on Safari on the iPad2 for me.
To those saying it isn't working, have you tried waiting? It seems the frames aren't pre loaded, so for the first few seconds of tilting on my iPhone 4s I was just getting a black screen with the occasional flicker.
A repeat post:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4612615
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4612615
Is this supposed to work on Android devices? It doesn't seem to do anything on my N7.
Doesn't work with any of my Android devices or browsers, so I'm guessing no.
It sorta works in a broken way in 4.1.2 on my Galaxy Nexus running stock browser.
Works great here, galaxy nexus on jellybean with chrome.
Same here, n7 + g.nexus
It's neat at first, but then it becomes very distracting, to the point where it is difficult to focus on anything else on the page. Perhaps the mouse movement can be captured only when it enters a bounding box around the image (+ some padding)?
I'm not sure if I can think of a use case for this, but I am also confident that someone, somewhere, will make an awesome thing using lenticular.js :)
I'm not sure if I can think of a use case for this, but I am also confident that someone, somewhere, will make an awesome thing using lenticular.js :)
I can see a lot of use for this for product reviews on sales sites. It would have to default to a static image first though.
Great work.
Great work.
Huh... mildly NSFW description in the page.
This works fine on my Galaxy Nexus. I'm using Chrome.
The only suggestion that I have is to do some smoothing of the values you get from the accelerometer. The movement can be a bit jerky.
The only suggestion that I have is to do some smoothing of the values you get from the accelerometer. The movement can be a bit jerky.
Jerky too on my SGS II
Gorgeous. Can't wait to use this on a project.
Just tried this on my iPhone 3Gs, not working
Not working on ipad or Galaxy Nexus either.
Is this supposed to work on the iPad as well? Only seems to work on my iPhone... But it's very cool!
I got a matte display to avoid reflections, but apparently someone found a workaround...
Doesn't work on Firefox for Android.
What license is this under?
The idea is nice. It shouldn't tell "things you'll never own" for the Lamborghini Aventador.
Well it is a 379,700 USD auto... most people aren't going to own it even if they can afford it.
If you have to ask how much it costs, you can't afford it.
I'm flooded with emotions. Where on earth did you come up with the name? I'm... a fan.
Also, the idea is very cool. There was a gif site posted here or reddit the other day that consumed far too much of my time. Similar to this, but this has to be fun to do while tilting the ipad. (Android version?)
Also, the idea is very cool. There was a gif site posted here or reddit the other day that consumed far too much of my time. Similar to this, but this has to be fun to do while tilting the ipad. (Android version?)
Ah, a different word than what I was going with :)
What word were you going with?
I think of lens-shaped objects, particularly lenticular clouds.
Until now I did not know what the name of those moving images were.
(I'm not the original poster)
Until now I did not know what the name of those moving images were.
(I'm not the original poster)
Ah, that's what I thought you meant too, but I'm a bit confused about what amazed you in the name. It's a good name, but I think it doesn't make much sense in this context, if it weren't for lenticular printing.
Coup
[deleted](1)
Because, you know, it breaks horribly in most stuff I throw at it and performs horribly bad even on desktop Chrome on a dev-machine.