Traffic on StackOverflow falls ~12% in the last week
Since the advent of ChatGPT, there has been an accelerating downward trend in growth rate of traffic in StackOverflow. If one were to extrapolate the traffic from before the release of ChatGPT, currently there is a ~12% difference between expected traffic and real traffic. Over 60% of the difference has happened in the last 7 days.
14 comments
1. What's the source of the data?
2. How is the extrapolation done? ("If one were to extrapolate...")
3. The headline (12% drop in the last week) contradicts the body of the post (60% of a 12% difference in the last week).
It would not surprise me in the slightest if Stack Overflow was becoming less popular. However, without more details the post comes across as just pulling numbers out of thin air.
2. How is the extrapolation done? ("If one were to extrapolate...")
3. The headline (12% drop in the last week) contradicts the body of the post (60% of a 12% difference in the last week).
It would not surprise me in the slightest if Stack Overflow was becoming less popular. However, without more details the post comes across as just pulling numbers out of thin air.
How are you measuring this? SO often sees a drop in traffic on/around spring break.
However, there is a broader falling trend in traffic dating back to ~2019, if I remember correctly.
However, there is a broader falling trend in traffic dating back to ~2019, if I remember correctly.
Either it's ChatGPT or it's all the layoffs. You don't need StackOverflow if you're not working
Well, if such a "tiny" reduction in workforce (certainly less than 12% or 60%) has led to such a traffic decrease on StackOverflow, I guess the layoffs have targeted those who significantly use SO for their day-to-day work.
Thus, if you don't want to get laid off in the next round, stop using StackOverflow ;)
Thus, if you don't want to get laid off in the next round, stop using StackOverflow ;)
What if the 12% were answering questions - not asking o.O. Hell, I'd rather a person go through the effort/thought process of asking a _good_ question to get closer to the answer they might be looking for.
I imagine majority of the SO visitors are neither asking nor answering questions, but only looking up answers for questions somebody else posted.
I can, however, come up with scenarious where company would choose either cohort for layoffs (so you are helping engineers from other companies on company dime?).
Still, I was completely tongue in cheek regarding causation and mostly noting that it is unlikely to be any correlation there.
I can, however, come up with scenarious where company would choose either cohort for layoffs (so you are helping engineers from other companies on company dime?).
Still, I was completely tongue in cheek regarding causation and mostly noting that it is unlikely to be any correlation there.
Google is also placing SO lower in their search results for me. Used to be consistently #1 and now it's behind some other blogs / tutorial sites.
Clickbaity as hell:
- title: "traffic .. falls ~12% last week"
- body: "accelerating downward trend in _growth rate_"
what it means if true: the SO traffic grows but slower than some implicit "before chatgpt" model predicts.
what it means if true: the SO traffic grows but slower than some implicit "before chatgpt" model predicts.
12% isn't very much. 15% change in traffic per month is normal for many sites. I'd watch for a longer term pattern - year, month on month.
Oh, that's just because I'm off this week.
lol, “it’s spring break, everybody is vacationing with their kids”.
i bet there is some truth to that though…
i bet there is some truth to that though…
I just have this amazing extension that answers stack overflow questions with chatGPT, let me tell you, that's the real deal
Woof. As long as you’re verifying the answer and making sure not to spread buggy code, this is probably good.
However; I’m sure there are agents out there that are more interested in gaming the stack overflow points system than acting morally.
AI has been trained on human generated code. What happens when AI is trained on code that AI has created. What a wonderfully absurd scenario. Technology is so much fun to be in, especially now.
However; I’m sure there are agents out there that are more interested in gaming the stack overflow points system than acting morally.
AI has been trained on human generated code. What happens when AI is trained on code that AI has created. What a wonderfully absurd scenario. Technology is so much fun to be in, especially now.
I do not see what is fun about this fiasco
That’s a valid perspective too!
I don't see the fiasco, most of the time, the human answers are wrong, and chatGPT answered one is right. I just run/test the code and review it.
This extension does not post your LLM generated answer, and I usually don't post it back tbh, it's just a nice shortcut from google > SO > ChatGPT. Have the same for google now
The extension Im talking about in case someone cares to try it https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chatgpt-for-stacko...
It excels when SO questions have no answers, ChatGPT will readily generate one for you. It's up about to the human to use that answer or repost it or not, I personally don't but I don't see why others shouldn't if the code works its not like its real magic
This extension does not post your LLM generated answer, and I usually don't post it back tbh, it's just a nice shortcut from google > SO > ChatGPT. Have the same for google now
The extension Im talking about in case someone cares to try it https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chatgpt-for-stacko...
It excels when SO questions have no answers, ChatGPT will readily generate one for you. It's up about to the human to use that answer or repost it or not, I personally don't but I don't see why others shouldn't if the code works its not like its real magic
It's against their policy and imo against the health of the website itself.
The code that chatGPT generates is often confidently wrong. I'd suggest you stop using it.
The code that chatGPT generates is often confidently wrong. I'd suggest you stop using it.
stackoverflow can be useful, but it’s not and never has been great. it’s very much the definition of good-enough. so i think with AI chat tools giving traditional search engines a run for their money at the moment, stackoverflow is looking at tough times ahead.
It was amazing when it first launched. When I first learnt to code you'd be lucky to find a half decent blog with the information you needed.
Where’s this information?
Please correct the title to reflect what has actually taken place.
Maybe closing the jobs sections removed some seasonal visits too.
Stackoverflow and reddit has broken login. I dont have sny sccounts on them.
This is anecdotal. In my search results, StackOverflow is less often the top result. Often I find solutions in GitHub issues, blogs, or first-party documentation. The bar for first-party docs has been raised in recent years - new React docs are one such example.
I see the opposite occurring in my searches. The official documentation sites are usually far down the results list behind blog spam sites.